Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am a East Dulwich resident who always struggles to find a car park space near my house, so often have no choice but to park in a nearby street after returning from the office. This situation has worsened over the last year or so due to a neighbour operating a people carrier rental business, therefore occupying at least four of these precious spaces!It seemingly isn't that successful as they are always there! I guess without car park permits he / she can do what they want? I just think it's really taking the micky and is very selfish.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/42474-street-car-parking-abuse/
Share on other sites

I know a lot of people will say "he's trying to run an business, and good luck to him" This is an arguable point of view, but there are. I believe, regulations about running your business from the street, which is what this bloke is, in effect doing. Otherwise why would people bother renting premises? Professional street car sales, for instance, were stamped out some years ago. With parking the way it is, I have a lot of sympathy with craigyboy. There's one operator in Upland Rd who's taking the michael in this way.

Lynne

If the vehicles are taxed and insured etc, they have a right to be parked anywhere on the public highway. You may not like it but the owner is not breaking any regulations, so there is no abuse in law. Commercial vehicles (which includes vehicles for hire) pay much higher insurance as well. There is no guaranteed right to be able to park outside your home on a public highway.
I'm surprised to hear that no regulations or bylaws are being broken. If I recall correctly there was a similar issue with Dulwich Van Hire using the roads nearby to park their vehicles when they sold their yard (next to Barrys Food Store, now a terrace of houses). They had to stop in the end, but I can't remember how that came about. There was a long thread on the forum about it.

If a home is being used as a business and it begins to cause material changes - then a load of laws are invoked.


"The likelihood of there having been such a material change of use may be indicated where the business or non-residential use generates visitors, traffic, noise or fumes over and above what might be expected if the property were in use as a single dwelling without any ancillary use.


If the relevant inspections are passed - than OK :)


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/businessclub/people/6581497/Home-businesses-battle-against-legislative-barriers.html


PokerTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know about Dulwich Van Hire, but there is

> no regulation to stop any vehicle that is properly

> taxed and insured from being park anywhere on a

> public highway. Many businesses, like taxi firms

> and car hire companies park their vehicles on the

> highway.

I can't see how parking four vehicles outside a residential address does that. Self employed people are allowed to trade from any prperty they own, even if it's their primary address. I dont see any evidence in the OPs thread that suggests anything more inconvenient that he/or she not being able to park outside their home sometimes.

The issue is planning permission to run a business from home - which is needed when it starts to effect other residents - I'd think then the council will limit the amount of businesses approved in an area. I think the Tories have relaxed regulations from what they were.


To me - about 4 cars may imply a start-up business may be being run. The business may expand - to be honest I'd just monitor for now (when does it become an issue - 10 cars for instance).

Good news craigyboy71, looks like one of them was rented today.


I would say get in there quick but it appears the tactical parking to save the space is already in operation.


I agreed about speaking to the owner, he seemed pleasant enough when i spoke to him once in passing.

Apart from people who have businesses I can't understand why anyone in ED would own a car anyway OP. Really there should be plenty of parking spaces for this guy's vans. It's zone two for crying out loud not some rural backwater like DV where you have to drive everywhere.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Excited to welcome Banook to the neighbourhood. Love a good bagel.
    • Majority of reported hate crime is based on ethnicity, brown, black and mixed heritage. Religious hate crime is lower and most affects Muslims, Jews to a slightly lowers number and a small percentage of Hindus and Sikhs.   Real or perceived atrocities committed by Muslim extremists and the state of Israel will influence numbers  Anyone who has been to a protest against the war in Gaza will see mainly peaceful and good natured crowds including Jews against war. @CPR Dave stop making a fool of yourself. Corbyn cannot admit to being wrong.  He sprouted nonsense that Russia was not responsible for the Salisbury poisoning, would not be contrite about the accusations of anti-Semitism, and is partly to blame for Brexit. He may be principled and a decent person but is not a Messiah and ran a poor campaign in the 2019 general election, a gift for Johnson. I expect he would have been pants in dealing with COVID, and Johnson set a low bar. I'm with Miss Jean Brody on the Spanish Civil War.  It maybe not!
    • How does your mind work? This is a thread about a bakery that may be opening. Your grasp of history is extremely weak. Mosley’s fascists were opposed and defeated all over the east end, not with petitions either. The principal leadership in driving them back came from the Communist Party but it was a united, cross community movement. The Daily Mail provided constant support for the British Union of Fascists and, along with sections of the Conservative Party, echoed their racist rhetoric. Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose. Excuse my French. To characterise pro-Palestinian demonstrations attended by thousands of Jews among the hundreds of thousands of people from across British society as “protesting Jews’ rights to exist” or comparing them to Mosley’s blackshirts is frankly sickening. You should be utterly embarrassed and ashamed of yourself.
    • I really hope so too, but they aren't going to get much passing trade, and parking round there isn't easy. Fingers crossed.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...