Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I went to use this machine at about 1230 today and minutes earlier a camera had been discovered. There was a pinhole looking down on the keypad. That is what alerted the guy who found it. The slot where the card goes also had something new and clean on it, completely unlike the last time I used it. The police were called and the manager of the Co-Op knows about it. Don't know what happened after that. Wonder if the info was transmitted somehow to the fraudsters or if they have to come back to retrieve it. Just wanted to let people know in case they have used it recently.

I had been using that cashpoint earlier the same day to withdraw some cash, luckily I always cover the keypad with my hand while typing the code....I hope they weren't able to spot it!! Better keep an eye on my statements though in the next few weeks. Thx for pointing out this Cate.


Does anyone know if the fraudsters need to retrieve their device (in which case I should be ok) or can they somehow control it remotely?

I hope the manager in the Co-op might have some more information. After seeing the camera there, behind the rubbery grey strip above keypad, I went to the HSBC ATM on LL to get some money. The strip above the keypad was completely different. It was hard plastic, bigger and deeper. It looked like it would be more difficult to put a camera behind and drill a hole through. Surely there must be some way to alarm the cash point if someone tampers with it? I always cover the keypad now when I type in my pin. Good tip mentioned on the Forum in a previous post.

I withdrew some cash at 10am from the same cash point. I didn't notice anything suspicious though I was half asleep.Nothing dodgy on my statement today.


Is it worth letting the bank know in advance of any fraudulant withdrawals? or cancelling cards

You probably wouldn't have noticed anything. You couldn't see the pinhole from a vertical standing position and the bit that was placed on the card slot looked OK on first sight but on second look you could see it was brand new, clean (unlike surrounding area) and sticking out. I would talk to your bank and take their advice. It could be that fraudsters didn't get any info if they couldn't take away the bit on card slot which I believe stores card numbers, not pin numbers. But probably safer to cancel card.
I bank with Lloyds and they've recently started doing a "SMS Overseas Transaction Alert" - so if your debit card gets used abroad you get an instant text alert. Appreciate prevention is better than cure, but it's a good way to get informed quickly if someone else is using your card details. Apparently the rationale is that fraudsters will often put through a small value debit to see if the card is working before putting through a major "purchase" and these transactions are increasingly overseas (i.e. no chip and pin). You can also pause the alerts if you are travelling yourself.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...