Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know this has been covered on this forum previously but given the speed of change that seems to be occurring in ED at the moment I wondered what people's thoughts were on the merits/quality of these two schools - when were they last OFSTED inspected? Does anyone know the extent of the catchment areas?


Perhaps people could give an update on the progress of both schools - we have relocated to Landells Road and will be looking to send our 2 year old to one of these in the next two years.


Look forward to hearing what people have to say (unless it is the usual ED forum class bashing...!)

You can find out when the schools were last OFSTEDed by looking on the OFSTED website for the full reports.


It is worth noting that schools can be brought down from 'outstanding' to 'good' on the basis, for example, that ONE book was found that had not been marked for 2 weeks, before basing your decision on OFSTED reports.


You can find the details of the further distance place offered in the first round this year by looking on the primary schools offer thread on here or phoning southwark who will email you a spreadsheet with all the distances this year for southwark primaries. Renata Hamvas has also posted this document on the thread on here.


I wouldn't worry too much about which to choose as a quick skim of the lengthy primary offers thread on here will demonstrate that rather than having to weigh up which you will send your child to, you will pretty much be told by Southwark where they're going, so your opinion of which you prefer is largely academic.


Hope that was free enough of class bashing for you! Maybe you should read the multiple threads on Heber, Goodrich, primary offers, distances, etc rather than 'those' threads!

Both are good schools, my kids are at Goodrich and very happy. They are expecting to be graded outstanding in the upcoming OFSTED assessment, but I agree with Hellosailor that this should be a guide and not used for a final decision. Schools are constantly changing.


The best way to get a true feel for schools is to attend school fetes, fun runs, boot sales etc.

It is not really a debate worth having. Look at your neighbours. The ones with young children and no older siblings. Where do they go? That is likely where you will get a place. Goodrich more likely from Landells I would say based on this year's allocation. It is a bigger school so has wider catchment. They are both good. OFSTeD is not a good way to decide. Enjoy having a toddler and relax about this would be my advice😉

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...