Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought it was a bit of ribbing, no need to get

> upset about it!


That's exactly what it was. Ribbing between mates who have all had their moments I'm sure. For me personally I found it quite funny as he looked a bit sheepish before Linekar (Mick Channon pronunciation) moved things on swiftly.


I did however think Henry had little of interest to say. Shearer was the only one worth listening to as you could tell he was miffed about England not winning and spoke from the heart which is unusual in a world of fence sitting cliche churners.


Oh and sorry if I or any other Irish people embarrass you SJ.

If that wasn't the most entertaining England performance in a long time I must be blind. Yet the pundits get more airtime here than the team. The question that needs to be addressed most in my opinion is what to do with Rooney? He is being treated like a utility player. Maybe he should be given the chance to play as a centre forward instead of Sturridge.


Reading PD's complaints about the Irish complaining about TH's handball when they got a penalty they should never had got in a previous game, is akin to saying TH would never have played if his Dad hadn't forgot the condom the night he was conceived.

Maybe I saw a different game to most and the papers.


But I saw a game in which one team were far better than the other; If England had scored again, Italy would have got another, I think they beat us in their stride without too much exertion.


I agree it was a far more positive approach and an entertaining game but we looked like a say, Switzerland, in terms of the gap between us and Italy. Happy to eat my words but I think we'll not make it out of the group and not get a win. That we have no world class players is abundantly clear but Barkley and Striling have potential to get there.


Just an embarrassment in terms of our standing rather than the actual performance.


Rooney drop him and Gerrard not that great either. I can't wait for the golden generation to pass!

I'm sure I'm not the only one planning my whole week/month around the world cup.


Sad I know but it's a necessity every four years.


Whether to try & watch whole match on-line at work or dash home in between & miss crucial second half.


Trying to find time for shopping, household tasks etc. Fitting in sleeping is bad enough, but when are you supposed to cook!?



Until the goal he assisted, Rooney wasn't even there. Lambert should have replaced him halfway through 2nd half.

Together with Barkley & Lallana (who should have come on sooner), it might have made all the difference.

I just had to lookup the stats for Switzerland v Italy given ????'s comment. Last 3 times they played it was a draw. Which is what I think England deserved yesterday overall.


My point about Rooney is if you are going to play him, play him where he is best. Just because Sturridge scored doesn't mean he should keep his place. What else did he do?

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If that wasn't the most entertaining England

> performance in a long time I must be blind. Yet

> the pundits get more airtime here than the team.

> The question that needs to be addressed most in my

> opinion is what to do with Rooney? He is being

> treated like a utility player. Maybe he should be

> given the chance to play as a centre forward

> instead of Sturridge.

>

> Reading PD's complaints about the Irish

> complaining about TH's handball when they got a

> penalty they should never had got in a previous

> game, is akin to saying TH would never have played

> if his Dad hadn't forgot the condom the night he

> was conceived.


As usual total bollocks. Let it go, you lost the game, end of.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I thought it was a bit of ribbing, no need to

> get

> > upset about it!

>

> That's exactly what it was. Ribbing between mates

> who have all had their moments I'm sure. For me

> personally I found it quite funny as he looked a

> bit sheepish before Linekar (Mick Channon

> pronunciation) moved things on swiftly.

>

> I did however think Henry had little of interest

> to say. Shearer was the only one worth listening

> to as you could tell he was miffed about England

> not winning and spoke from the heart which is

> unusual in a world of fence sitting cliche

> churners.

>

> Oh and sorry if I or any other Irish people

> embarrass you SJ.


You don't help you manage perfectly well on your own.

AM, my point about Switzerland is that's about our level not our style of play or results we feel we are in the 2nd tier.


Rooney by and large doesn't play where he wants for united and as Scholes has honestly but undiplomatically pointed out he's past his best.


Agree with Mick, for once Shearer showed a bit of passion, I think he too was depressed at where our level is now. Obvioulsy we need to play to try and beat Urugay in the next game but if we fail I hope he plays the young 11 in the Costa Rica without a Lampard, Gerrard or Rooney starting.


PS Johnson was an embarrassment. Also Ironic that the only old guard player we did miss was Cashley

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If that wasn't the most entertaining England

> > performance in a long time I must be blind. Yet

> > the pundits get more airtime here than the

> team.

> > The question that needs to be addressed most in

> my

> > opinion is what to do with Rooney? He is being

> > treated like a utility player. Maybe he should

> be

> > given the chance to play as a centre forward

> > instead of Sturridge.

> >

> > Reading PD's complaints about the Irish

> > complaining about TH's handball when they got a

> > penalty they should never had got in a previous

> > game, is akin to saying TH would never have

> played

> > if his Dad hadn't forgot the condom the night

> he

> > was conceived.

>

> As usual total bollocks. Let it go, you lost the

> game, end of.


I thought my point was quite good and your response normal for you. Like I care about that game any more. You seem to though.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Alan Medic Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > If that wasn't the most entertaining England

> > > performance in a long time I must be blind.

> Yet

> > > the pundits get more airtime here than the

> > team.

> > > The question that needs to be addressed most

> in

> > my

> > > opinion is what to do with Rooney? He is

> being

> > > treated like a utility player. Maybe he

> should

> > be

> > > given the chance to play as a centre forward

> > > instead of Sturridge.

> > >

> > > Reading PD's complaints about the Irish

> > > complaining about TH's handball when they got

> a

> > > penalty they should never had got in a

> previous

> > > game, is akin to saying TH would never have

> > played

> > > if his Dad hadn't forgot the condom the night

> > he

> > > was conceived.

> >

> > As usual total bollocks. Let it go, you lost

> the

> > game, end of.

>

> I thought my point was quite good and your

> response normal for you. Like I care about that

> game any more. You seem to though.



Strafer was right, embarrassing.

Who am I kidding. The 5 - 7 matches are basically a no go because the TV in our house will be in kid mode. I'm lucky if I've taken control in time for the 8pm KO.


Anyway, its Game of Thrones night, so might take a night off the world cup.


Thought Bosnia walked away from last night with some pride.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it's a good idea and follows the example of other towns/areas. As it says in the article, the area around the main tourist attractions in Southwark, that is The Globe, Southwark Cathedral, Tate Modern and the whole walking route from London Bridge to Blackfriars, takes a lot of maintaining and it shouldn't be a burden on regular council tax payers like us. 
    • Turn your used stamps into vital funds to support human rights around the world.   How it works: Simply send us your stamps and we'll then sort through them to sell or auction. We accept all stamps of all origin and value – both used and new. Foreign and commemorative ones are likely to be worth the most. Please leave at least half centimetre of paper around the stamps Send your stamps to: FAO Robin Sandow c/o The Post Room Amnesty International UK 2nd Floor, Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street, London, WC1X 0DW Recycle your stamps.AIUK.pdf
    • Also, if he enjoys design or drawing (alongside his maths & tech) he might like the Greenpeace competition for a poster (see Lounge post) - 5 days left to enter. Something more for some time at home, but ...
    • Deadline in 5 days! Important Dates 🗓 Submission deadline: 25 July 2025 🗳 Public voting opens: 7 August 2025 🚢 Winners announced: 15 August 2025   Time is running out! There are only 5 days left to submit your design for Greenpeace’s poster competition. This is your chance to help send a powerful, creative message across Europe: We must stop fossil gas, oil and coal and move toward a fossil-free future. No matter your skill level, everyone is welcome. Whether you're sketching by hand, designing on a screen, or crafting a collage, we want to see your vision. 🎨 The 3 winning designs will receive:     A printed full-size poster of your artwork     50 postcards of your design     An exclusive Greenpeace campaign t-shirt   How to enter     Design your poster     Use any style you like – hand-drawn, painted, digital, collaged. Just make sure it’s original and fits our message.     Submit your design     Upload a photo or file using the form on this page. You’ll need to include your name and contact email.     Vote for your favourites     After the submission deadline, we’ll shortlist poster designs that you can vote for! Share the voting page with your friends so you have a better chance to win.     Your poster in the European Parliament and on the Arctic Sunrise The top-voted design will be sent to all members of the European Parliament as postcards. The three designs with the most votes will be printed as posters and postcards, and will be part of the Arctic Sunrise ship tour this fall. As a winner, you will get printed versions of your poster and a Greenpeace t-shirt.    Direct link: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/act/send-your-poster-design/?utm_campaign=fff-ban-new-fossil-fuel-projects&utm_source=hs-email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=fff-poster-design-contest-3rd-email-2025-07-20&utm_term=2025-07-20-poster-design-contest-3rd-email-button-2&global_project=fossil-free-future Time is running out! There are only 5 days left to submit your design for Greenpeace’s poster competition. This is your chance to help send a powerful, creative message across Europe: We must stop fossil gas, oil and coal and move toward a fossil-free future. No matter your skill level, everyone is welcome. Whether you're sketching by hand, designing on a screen, or crafting a collage, we want to see your vision. 🎨 The 3 winning designs will receive:     A printed full-size poster of your artwork     50 postcards of your design     An exclusive Greenpeace campaign t-shirt The deadline is 25 July 2025. After that, we’ll shortlist the top designs and the public will vote for the winners. Don't wait and join today! Join the competition now 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...