Jump to content

Recommended Posts

He gets a lot of stick on the East Dulwich forum. I often find myself wanting to develop a contrary line of thought. But I am genuinely struggling to feel anything positive about him. In fact I can't really get past his face, which looks that of an unnaturally aged 7 year old. Anyone got anything positive to give me? I have reconciled to him being around for a while at least.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/45205-michael-gove/
Share on other sites

"He's the only man in the government with a vision.


It might be the wrong vision but he's got one"


Yes, I am afraid that doesn't help. In general my experience of people with visions, is that rather having some deep insight they are prone to a solipsistic tendency to ignore the complexities of reality. But then again I would class myself as a gloomy existentialist...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/45205-michael-gove/#findComment-752871
Share on other sites

Hazel Blears came out publicly yesterday to support his line on extremism in schools. Many of the more thoughtful commentators on education (teachers and opposition politicians included) have supported many of the measures he has introduced. Knee jerk opposition from self-interested teachers and parody urban lefties (see Quids above) is a sign he's doing something right. I think recently he's been caught up in the reaction to UKIP/pressure from the Tory right, hence the rubbish about British vs foreign literature, but generally he's a very effective SoS. He does get a lot of stick on the EDF, but little in the way of coherent argument about actual policies.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/45205-michael-gove/#findComment-752961
Share on other sites

I dunno, he normally gets taken to task for the stupid things he _does_ do; effective management of a govt dept is never newsworthy after all.


dropping english language classics because theyre not british is pretty awful knee jerk ukip appeasement, and that whole WW1 historical revisionism certainly wound me up.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/45205-michael-gove/#findComment-752965
Share on other sites

He gets it in the neck firstly because he is a Tory Education Secretary- and by definition will incur the wrath of teachers- just because.

I think reducing the opportunities for students to sit exams is primarily a money saving exercise.

Prior to this current regime, A level students could sit some of their modules up to 4 times each. And if they take 4 subjects at AS and 3 at A2 that was potentially 38 exams altogether. Some students may have an A on a module but would resit to get a better A and maximise their UCAS points on easy modules since they cannot resit their final June modules.

People have to be paid to produce them, invigilate them, mark them, sit with students over lunch time when they have clashes so that they do not access phones and computers.

Most schools would not pay for all resits and parents would pay but even so the process must be subsidised since they do not cost very much.

Also he is reforming BTEC exams- the dropout rate of students who get into uni with a BTEC (all coursework- does not appear to be externally moderated!)is high so subjecting BTEC students to sitting exams may reduce the dropout rate.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/45205-michael-gove/#findComment-753114
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

"Liam Nolan, the head teacher who successfully turned around Perry Beaches school in Birmingham, thinks Mr Gove is a hero rather than a villain. ?I?m a Labour-voting member of the NUT but I think it?s an absolute disgrace that he is being criticised for a success story. In the past, schools have been too willing to blame culture or poverty for lack of success. We don?t take any excuses. I want the children I serve to have the same chances as children who go to Eton or Harrow. Michael Gove has exactly the same mission.?


From yesterday's Sunday Times

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/45205-michael-gove/#findComment-756190
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Our 10 month old kitten has been missing since this morning from Nutbrook street. I know that's  not that long but he's not well and on medication for diarrhea, vomiting, and eating very little. He only ever goes out back and today he got out the front door, an area he's never been before. He's very good about coming home when you call him but no sign.  Answers to Jeffrey or Jeff.  Please get in touch if  you see him as I think he will be very dehydrated very soon. 
    • A Google search brought up eleven Chango  branches, although they don't all seem to be listed on their website. In the order they came up: East Dulwich, Clapham Common, Mayfair, Wandsworth, City of London, Wimbledon,  Parsons Green, Kensington, Highgate, Richmond, Hampstead. I think it is the positioning of this new branch that has mostly got to me. I accept that they would have to go for where a space became vacant, but Lordship Lane is pretty long, even just the part with shops in,  and choosing to  open a stone's throw away from Chacarero seems mean, to say the least. I wonder if they have made contact with Chacarero. It would be nice to think they had (in a friendly way, obviously!) As regards the apparent  marketing spiel, at least one of the online reviewers also refers to a Chango branch (the Parsons Green one in this case) as a "gem". Probably just coincidence and a word in common use to describe such places. I wouldn't know. I'm ancient 🤣
    • I like empanadas. I don't think Chango is a massive chain - it's got a few stores all in London I believe (stand to be corrected if I've got that wrong). I don't see a problem with them opening on the Lane personally. I really like Chacarero, but that doesn't mean that they should be immune from competition - if they're successful and open a couple more stores, are we then meant to stop supporting them for being a 'chain'?  That opening post does sound a lot like marketing spiel though. Is the OP perhaps connected to the new business I wonder?
    • According to what I can see online, Dynamic Vines and Cave de Bruno sell totally different kinds of wine to each other.  Dynamic Vines  "work with independent winemakers who produce outstanding wine using sustainable practices in the vineyard and minimal intervention in the cellar".  Cave de Bruno specialises in French wines and spirits from small independent producers. So two different USPs, and no doubt two different but overlapping customer bases who can afford these wines. Probably different again to the people mainly  shopping for wine at Majestic or the Co op. On the other hand, the two empanada shops appear on the face of it to be selling virtually identical products. But time will tell, won't it? Let's see how they are both doing in - say - a couple of years' time. Impossible, of course, to compare that with how they would have done if there had been only one of them. I just feel more  sorry for the original one than for  the one which can apparently already afford to have a number of shops in places like Mayfair and Highgate. I'm tempted to buy something there every week, and I don't even like that kind of pastry 🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...