Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there, I've already posted this message on the forum a few weeks ago and had a lot of success so I was hoping to attract those who might not have participated the first time round.


My name is Leonie Duff, a Psychology Postgraduate at Royal Holloway

University. I am currently running a study which is looking at mothers

and their roles in the family and work place. I am deeply interested in

how mothers manage their roles and the consequent impact on their

self-perception and life satisfaction.


I was wondering if you would mind filling out this online questionnaire which should take 10 minutes and would be extremely helpful to me.



http://www.pc.rhul.ac.uk/sites/surveys/TakeSurvey.asp?SurveyID=9MM9m7KK8555G



I hope that you find this project worthwhile and would very much

appreciate your help. Also any thoughts on the topic or questionnaire itself would be very interesting to me.


Thank you for taking the time to read my post.

Leonie Duff

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/45459-plea-to-mothers/
Share on other sites

Very happy to contribute to this. I did feel that one question was extremely difficult to answer, and, because you couldn't pass on it and there was no space to comment on it, my thoughts are below.


"Below please indicate the ratio which best defines to what extent you see yourself as: A mother (percentage indicated on the left) : An employed/unemployed person(percentage indicated on the right"


I answered 50/50 but I don't see these things as opposites. I feel 100% me: that includes my roles as a mother and as a worker but disregards the other things I see myself as and the other roles I have (e.g as a wife, a musician, a daughter/sister etc etc). I don't see these as labels we can only attach to ourselves part of the time. Or did I misunderstand what you were looking for here?


The rest of the questions were very thought provoking and nuanced. I hope the research goes well.

I agree with Yak - some of the ways in which the questions were phrased conflicted with how I see it - I am completely a mother and completely an employed person - I think of myself as both at the same time, rather than as separate parts. I actually answered 60/40 because of literal time analysis, but when I am at work I am still a mother! Anyway - interesting and I hope useful!
I've just done your questionnaire - very interesting and made me think. I particularly liked putting a percentage on how much I feel like a mum versus an employed person. I agree you can feel wholly both but being a mum takes up about 70% of my emotional and physical energy versus 30% taken up by work.
  • 2 weeks later...
I've just seen your responses, thank you so much for taking the time to both fill in the questionnaire and leave your thoughts on this forum. It's really helpful to have your comments and I will definitely address them in the discussion part of my project. This has certainly opened my eyes to motherhood, thank you for all your contributions!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...