Jump to content

Road Safety in Southwark - Cyclists & Pedestrians (and other road users) have your say !


Recommended Posts

The other day I received a questionnaire from Southwark Council asking me for views on their Road Safety Plan. What is the Road Safety Plan I hear you ask - well to quote from draft consultation document:


"This road safety plan is primarily aimed at reducing road deaths and casualties and making

sustainable transport safer and more attractive. In doing this, it will help to achieve wider

council objectives such as encouraging shift to more active modes of travel, tackling issues

of obesity and addressing issues surrounding climate change."


..and specifically for cyclists..


"Of all people injured on Southwark?s roads, 18% are cyclists and the vast majority of

cyclists injured are males aged between 25 and 59. Cyclists are the only group of users to

suffer an increase in the numbers who have been injured or killed on Southwark roads and

therefore cyclist safety is paramount to the concerns of the council."


If you are interested in reading the draft Road Safety Plan or getting a copy of the questionnaire then you can access it here.

I tend to agree - the 2010 target for cyclists is 12 "seriously injured or killed" however the document goes on to say that


"The increase in casualties should be seen in context of the growing popularity of cycling.

Since 2000 there has been an 83% increase in the number of people making cycle trips

each day."


file.php?5,file=2456

file.php?5,file=2455

I too have been sent this questionnaire. I am going to encourage Southwark to be brave (so that will be a waste of time, then).


Get rid of all superfluous road signs and traffic lights except pelican crossings as has successfully been done in Walworth Road.

Allow bikes to share all bus lanes with cyclists as they do in Richmond, Bath, and various other towns round UK.

Get rid of all speed humps and bumps. They encourage bad driving because drivers will swerve a lot, and not concentrate on planning ahead which is the correct and safer way as advised in Highway Code.

Have longer free parking areas by parades of shops (ie Nunhead) with a limit for an hour.

Get rid of confusing and petrol consuming one way systems (can waste petrol and road surfacing on badly signposted one way systems trying to get to or from an address! Not all SatNavs know the systems, either.)

Stop trying to change nature - people walk in to the road without looking and always will.


I am against a 20 mph limit in Southwark. I think it's stupid and will not work or solve anything. Any "limit" is going to anger people and make us out to be a police-borough (if not police state borough). If you make getting from A to B as easy as possible without unnecessary traffic lights and confusing road signs everywhere, people will be more relaxed.


Now, where's that cuckoo.

I personally think road safety these days should be shaken up and pedestrians should take far more responsibility. I'm going to try my hardest not to turn this into a rant but apologise in advance if some think it is. I hold both a car and Motorbike license, a don't like driving a car and only do so very rarely (about once or twice a month) and ride my bike to work. Is road safety still taught in schools today or is it now the parents responsibility (that's a genuine question). I ask this because increasingly people all over the capital but especially in central London seem so unaware of the car/weapon and just step out into the road without a moments thought to check the road for oncoming vehicles. This may sound bizzare but I personally blame the ipod for this recent surge in lack of care. People are sucked into their own little world by the tune they're listening to and in doing so loose all awareness of the danger they are stepping into. Every time I shout and scream at them to watch where they're going they don't acknowledge me until they see my mouth moving in their direction and surprise surprise, they have to take off their ipod or whatever digital attachment is distracting them to realise how close I came to sending them to hospital or worse. When crossing the road I always look left and right and if I'm at a junction look left, right and BEHIND me. These fools are nearly always British adults.

I ride a motorbike and pushbike to work; the iPod zombies are a menace. I saw a bus clip one of them the other day in Victoria who was completely oblivious to anything around him. In New York, it's such a problem, it's a fineable offence akin to jaywalking: http://www.iphonesavior.com/images/2008/01/08/ipod_road_safety.jpg


And the people who enter a crossing when the green man is flashing are a pain, which means stop unless you are already on the road (although I'd say this is a design flaw; everywhere else in the world it flashes red).


I'd bring in those 'countdown' crossings which count down in seconds until the light turns green. You know where you stand then.

kford Wrote:

> And the people who enter a crossing when the green

> man is flashing are a pain...


Worry no more. It's been a while since I saw a flashing green man in London. Those pedestrians who bother to use crossings mostly get a 'blank' phase which, as you'd expect, causes a fair deal of confusion.


In an odd spasm of common sense, the DfT is currently pressing for the 'blank' phase to be replaced with an innovative 'red man' in order to make things a bit clearer. Success isn't guaranteed - older readers may remember that an apparently simple two-colour safety system has proved more than a challenge to the most experienced, sober and overpaid of train drivers - but it's the thought that counts.

Along with stopping pedestrians crossing the road when the green is flashing, may we have a similar strong deterrent against the motorist accelerating through a flashing amber and a full on red? I suggest a fully armed PCSO at every corner.>:D
A friend of mine recently was awarding a ?30 fine for cycling through a red light at a very busy junction. When ask why he went through he told the officer simply "I had to get to work". Quite clearly only thinking of himself. He really couldnt see the danger he risked not only to himself but also to others...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OOOOooooOOOooohhhHHHHHH 👜 👜 👜 
    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...