Jump to content

Hairdresser good with long hair?


shell

Recommended Posts

shell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Help. I normally go to Gemma at Kuki but she's

> booked up for weeks and I'm desperate. Any

> recommendations for hairdressers particularly good

> with long layered hair?

Nicky Clarke is well rated and he's got long hair - not sure if it's layered.

I'd also recommend Stevie. I have thick curly hair who many hairdressers have struggled with in the past. I contacted Stevie after seeing her recommended on the forum. I'm delighted with her. She is excellent at straightening/styling my hair. She is always prompt, reliable & very cheery. Give her a go. I'm sure you won't be disappointed. 07535 660509
  • 2 weeks later...
Might be a bit late on this but I can recommend Miguel at Rocks hair - I know he's had a few positive comments on this forum but I do think it's justified. When long, my hair tends to somehow be both completely flat and flyaway but he manages to transform it. Plus he's lovely.
  • 1 month later...
Just wanted to recommend my hairdresser Stevie. She is fantastic. She comes to your house and is always punctual and friendly. She really listens to what you want unlike a lot of people who tell you what they would like you to have! She is really good with colours and a good cutter and her prices are very competitive. A genuinely nice person so I really don't dread it anymore! Her number is 07535 660509
  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...