Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I hardly ever watch his Friday show, but the odd bits I see I like well enough. Usually seen on the early morning Sunday slot, but even then, not a must-see.

I'd listen to his radio show on my portable Roberts radio when I used to go to Sainsbury on DoKeHi of a Saturday morning and thoroughly enjoyed it. I stopped going (no particular reason, though now I think of it, going out of my way to procure what Charlie Brown described as 'Blah' may have had something to do with it, dearish 'Blah' at that), and stopped listening, couldn't tell you why, really. It no longer seemed the 'must listen' it once was. My fault, maybe, Jonathan didn't change, so perhaps I did.

Whenever I watch his film reviews, I like his analysis and comments. Just don't watch very often.

As far as it goes, whatever part of my licence tax contributes towards his wages is, well, OK. I suppose.

I think I like the idea and the fact that he's around and available, much more than the actuality.


I'd like him to come back, but right now I couldn't give you ten reasons why.

Well I liked his Friday show for the quality of the guests he sometimes got on, and also watching how the various women handled the appalling "lad" persona he always employed. Jane Fonda was a highlight - "Jonathan you need to get laid" actually shut him up for a moment. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Baby clothes needed for a boy of 4 months. Family are refugees from Sudan
    • Brian came to repaint my bathroom and over the course of the few days he was there he was efficient, kind, and very conscientious, cleaning up at the end of every day and going above and beyond to provide a fantastic service. The paint has held up great - much better than before! Thank you Brian!
    • Those studies are ten years old. I wonder if there is anything more recent. Also, I haven't looked at them, but from what you say,  the studies apparently asked people if THEY thought they were "racially prejudiced". For several  reasons, on the face of it that isn't likely to produce an accurate indication of the level of actual racial prejudice in that sample. Also, how was "racial prejudice" defined? And "racist attitudes"?
    • I'd say hold on to it in case you need it. There may be a time when it helps you get around more easily. You'd know if that's easily done, if you've got somewhere to park it etc   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...