Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...

Now, I have just been doorstepped by a neighbour with a petition go keep ED police station open. I commented that I thought it was a foregone conclusion, she got a bit shirty with me. It is likely to put off potential signatories if petition weilders are not prepared to argue the point a bit, but besides that is she right - is there any point, is it something likely to be overcome by public pressure, is she a one woman band or are there other petitions out there?

I don't especially want it to close, but just wondered if those with more knowledge of local democrarcy had a view?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/47-police-station/#findComment-2786
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
I am only concerned about what will be done with the police who live there now. They clearly aren't a very bright or capable lot and if we put them somewhere where they really could do something (eg. access to firearms, radios, fast-cars, flashing blue lights, Tasers etc) there could be real harm done. I thought that was why they had stables and horses there for them to get around - ie. it is very difficult to crash a horse! Indeed, if we could train the horses to answer the phones and take statements, we could get rid of all the coppers and people would probably notice a distinct improvement in the quality of service!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/47-police-station/#findComment-8742
Share on other sites

Perhaps they could hand over management to the Horniman, and turn it into an anthropology installation demonstrating what 'bobbies' were like in the good old days, complete with sound effects as you moved between the exhibits


"Hello hello hello."

"I was proceeding in a northerly direction, when the suspect..."

"It's ten twenty-six, madam."

"The desk sergeant has gone to tea."

"I must warn you that under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, anything you say may be..."

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/47-police-station/#findComment-8863
Share on other sites

I don't think I've ever seen a plod in east dulwich, except in the olden days when they had the horses there.


The people strolling about in their bright kagouls (community something or others) are supposed to be some kind of visual reassurance, but its odd that since they've been Lynda Snelling it around the bridlepaths of ED there's only been an upsurge in big yellow boards. Hmmm maybe thats one for the SLP and their super sleuthing ways.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/47-police-station/#findComment-8872
Share on other sites

Alternatively, Louisiana, we could have an exhibit demonstrating common modern-day responses from the boys in blue, eg:


"Wot?"

"'Ow do you spell that?"

"Wot you want us to do about it? It's a criminal matter."

"Nothin' I can do. I have to go arrest a five year old for dropping litter."

"I'm on me tea-break."

"Wot?"

"Wot?"

"Have you eaten a dictionary for breakfast or somefink?"

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/47-police-station/#findComment-8893
Share on other sites

I saw a bobby on the beat walking up Underhill Road the other day - so they do exist. Presumably if the ED station closes we won't see any bobbies walking from Camberwell!


I have to say that I do see a fair few police cars - perhaps that says something about where I live! I must pay closer attention to the neighbours...or is it me they're after??!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/47-police-station/#findComment-8928
Share on other sites

You quite lost me there louisiana. I'm guessing s***ker? Is that a rude word?

I went through smacker, skunker, skanker and swanker (whatever that is) before settling on s***ker.


The residents association on the langford green estate asked the police to send more patrols around our way. I believe they politely said they'd do their best, but that there are 20+ estates in Southwark classes as severe knife problem estates and at least a couple marked as gun problems, and that our estate and the neighbouring champion hill one were relatively oases of law abiding calm.


In fact apart from a couple of speeding vans and xr3is, I haven't really seen a hint of trouble,

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/47-police-station/#findComment-8953
Share on other sites

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You quite lost me there louisiana. I'm guessing

> stalker? Is that a rude word?

>


It is in my book (6)


Actually, the idea was to stop Google bringing up EDF posts when search on the word. So that strategy's blown :-S


Louisiana

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/47-police-station/#findComment-8962
Share on other sites

That's quite alright, Mockney.


Anyway, the plods were not totally efficient, but not totally plodding either. They took it seriously, did the necessary (including tracing his car etc.), paid him a visit, and that probably really put the wind up him and it stopped. So all in all, very effectively dealt with.


But their organisation does seem to be byzantine: very difficult to figure out who does what, which is half the battle.


Louisiana

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/47-police-station/#findComment-8972
Share on other sites

the plods regularly walk down my bit of Lordship Lane - they seem to keep the local sandwich bar in business ... that's why you never see them, they're busy with their sarnies. incidentally, a few months ago they were given bikes, and for a couple of weeks i kept seeing them cycling past on their Met bicycles. haven't seen one since, bikes have probably been abandoned in the empty horse stables. which taxpayer forked out for them bikes then??!! this thread rather reminds me of the Neasden Police Log column in Private Eye - they must have used ED Police for inspiration
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/47-police-station/#findComment-8988
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm reviving this thread especially for malumbu! Thanks for reminding me of it, mal! Now you'll probably have irrational rage because you couldn't find the thread. I just did a search for irrational 🤣
    • No I won't. This has nothing to do with Ryedale and everything to do with the way people approach news. 
    • I'm getting dozens of fliers a year from all the estate agents.  I'm not selling, thinking of selling or renting out. The one from John D Woods really got my goat as it is plastic coated so can't even be recycled.  I've emailed them.  They must be making so much money to to these mass mail outs.  I couldn't find the old thread about things that put you into an irrational rage (although this rage is not irrational) I have a nice time too watching GB win their first medal at the Winter Olympics - that is an understatement! I'll burn it, sod the tiny impact on air quality.   Post script, ok calmed down, the thing wouldn't burn and would set my alarm off anyway so outside charred.  The e-mail bounced back to what a great company.  But it would be interesting to hear views, serious or humorous about estate agent marketing
    • @PenguinYou will have to explain this to me bearing in mind your and others outrage at a possible new scheme on Ryedale, and the use by many on this forum of Southwark News to support their reaction. I don't know what precautionary mindset means.  The precautionary principle is that we need to act now for example in tackling climate change rather than wait twenty years for conclusive evidence (that was the situation in 2006 when Stern published his report) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...