Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Zebedee Tring Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "The Peck"! Is this really the new lovable

> nickname for the neighbourhood formerly known as

> Peckham? How about Catters for Catford and Lewy

> for Lewisham?


I'm hearing it more like P'kaam and Lw'shaam

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cle Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I have also heard attempts at 'Pecksvegas'.

>

> Yeah... doesn't quite work, does it?

>

> Peckhampton?


The slightly sorrowful Pexmas markets pull the naming off I suppose, but they're given that X.

cle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The slightly sorrowful Pexmas markets pull the naming off I suppose


Sorrowful? I quite enjoyed the recent Pexmas "munch" thing. Although admittedly the "panel discussions" were a bit of a strange idea...

cle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'Newisham' I believe it is, now that Jonathan

> Downey has turned his eyes to it.

>

> I have also heard attempts at 'Pecksvegas'.


But I do enjoy model market.


I must be a hipster or something.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cle Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The slightly sorrowful Pexmas markets pull the

> naming off I suppose

>

> Sorrowful? I quite enjoyed the recent Pexmas

> "munch" thing. Although admittedly the "panel

> discussions" were a bit of a strange idea...


the Christmas market was pretty tragic - didn't make the munch thing. Much prefer that indoor market in the Bussey that's occasionally on.

dollydaydream Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Streatham in the 80's became St. Reatham's about

> the same time clapham became Clarm



When growing up we used to often say we were off to the coast. When asked, where? We would respond "Berm-On-Sea"


*sigh*


I hope this tradition is being carried on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Let them go bust.  Enact emergency legislation to ensure that the water still flows and the rest of the network operates. Why should we care what happens to the investors.  Have no idea could or would this work, and where next. And the workers will still be needed whoever runs the show.
    • I think you might mean 'repossession' rather than 'reprocessing'.  
    • I think this is a bit of a myth.  It's true that some of the current owners are pension funds (chiefly the Ontario Universities') but they're global outfits, big enough to know what they're about. As for ordinary UK pension funds, they mostly invest in publicly-tradeable stocks, which Thames no longer is (it's a private limited company, not a PLC), so even those that lazily track the markets by buying everything in the index won't be exposed as Thames isn't in any index. In other words, it's a lot less complicated than Thames, the Government or innumerable consultancies and PR outfits would like you to believe. In case, incidentally, the idea of a cooperative offends any delicate Thatcherite sensibilities, I'd argue that it fits the Thatcherite vision of a stakeholding democracy much better than selling tradeable shares to the public very cheaply. The public, despite their blessable cottons, are too easily tempted by the small but easy win (which is how they sold off their own building societies, preparing the ground for the credit crunch and then the crash) and, as became obvious after every privatisation before or since, their modest stakes inevitably end up in the hands of financial engineers whose only priority is to siphon off the assets and leave the husk to either go bankrupt or get "rescued" by the taxpayers (who thus get to pay twice for nothing). The root of that is the concept of "limited liability" which makes it all possible, but even the most nauseating free-market optimist would struggle to predict the demise of that.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...