Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone read either of these books and would you recommend them?


I have a 3.5y girl and a 1.5y old boy and despite them being raised in the same way so far (same toys, nursery, play experiences etc) they are totally stereotypical girl and boy, completely poles apart. I always thought I would raise my children equally, whatever their gender, however, apart from loving them equally, they are not the same person (sounds obvious, I know) and clearly do not have the same personality. I'm mindful of not reprimanding behaviour in one but tolerating it in the other based on their gender e.g. she mustn't climb on the table and throw toys versus let him climb on the table and throw toys, he is just being boy. But maybe I am going too much the other way and not letting my son be a boy?


Anyway, enough of my rambling thoughts, I know you can't raise a child from a book but this would be my first foray into parenting books - wold you recommend these particular titles?


Thanks!

Yes! I had a girl first and then a boy. Girl rode a bike age 9 years, boy constantly riding in circles backwards at Nursery. So many differences, and when I read Raising Boys I was so relieved. Easy to read, and explained what I could see with my own eyes.....they are different. I come from a family of 4 girls, so the book was helpful on lots of levels e.g. the idea that children in our society don't have rites of passage when they become teenagers. That really made me think, and helped us talk with our children about a goal they would like to attain when they were 13. all the best
Hi, just to say I have 2 girls, the little one is only 9 months but already much more of a scamp than the older one. My own younger sister was the same, always the one wanting to climb onto the table, throw toys, rip books etc! So it might just be a younger sibing thing...

Thanks both for your replies and others for your PMs.


Mathilda - yes, I thought it was a second child thing or just that they have different personalities. However, so many times people have said that 'he's boy' that I began to wonder if the differences were at least partly due to just that.

Hi srisky


I am skimming Raising Boys at the moment and on the whole it's a good and helpful read. I just wanted to flag up that pretty early on in the book he says that boys shouldn't go to nursery before they are 3. I resisted throwing the book across the room at this point, and muttered quite a few swear words (my son has been extraordinarily happy at nursery and outside it). It can be quite offputting and I thought it might be helpful for you to be forewarned as it sounds like your boy is at nursery too.Once you're over that bit, the rest is ok and has got some good tips.


(I don't want to open up a big debate as to the rights or wrongs of that approach btw!)

I only have one child, a girl, who is so typically "a boy" that however she is dressed/introduced to people they continue to talk to her as a boy. It's been quite eye opening in terms of how much projection is involved with gendering our children. However I had read Cordelia Fine's "Delusions of Gender" before having children so am inclined to think much of this is overstated anyway, particularly any kind of claim for biological determinism. Delusions of Gender is written by a neuroscientist, she examines many of the claims made for male/female brains etc and I highly recommend it - at least read it alongside Bidulph etc so you can decide for yourself where the differences lie. Also recommend Pink Brain Blue Brain by Lise Elliot.


My little girl is incredibly loud, active, ferocious, tough etc. People remark on what a typical boy she is ALL THE TIME. If I ever bother to say "yes... actually she's a girl" then the change in tone is notable - suddenly "she's so gentle" while she thwacks the cat, or "so pretty" as she launches herself headfirst off a slide. As a boy "she's so brave/tough/etc".


I don't think this one anecdotal experience proves anything but I do see how easily I might have ascribed her behaviour / personality to her sex had she been more typically "girly" or born a boy.


Hope I haven't offended anyone! Just genuinely interested / passionate about this subject.


Also - a friend, also on the forum, attended the "Raising Boys" course at Rosendale Children's Centre and found it invaluable with suggestions for reaching her sterotypically boyish 3yr old. Will ask her to post details x

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...