Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Quick update that might put a slightly different slant on this:-


1/ Ex-Wifey is married and has been for 3 years.

2/ They divorced 8 years ago not "3".

3/ Wifey1 persuaded her New Husband to have my M8 to their Wedding even though he had reservations,indeed my M8 says that he was so much part of "Ex-Wifeys" big new day that he "MC'd/Hosted the reception do as well as attended the Ceremony.

Indiepanda, I think you've misunderstood what I was trying to say.


I didn't mean that you would need to prove anything to your ex, just that your current partner should feel secure in the fact that you are marrying them, and if your ex is there, all they are going to see is you marrying someone else.


Hope that makes sense, I know what I mean, but not sure I'm putting it across.


As for the bragging bit, I was sort of joking, but I bet there are women out there who would take pleasure in it!

Don't worry Keef, I was being slighly mischievious in taking a slightly too literal interpretation of what you had said - I know you are the resident Mr Reasonable of the forum really.


And I'm inclined to agree there are some women out there who would like the bragging rights, I hope I don't end up ever feeling like that, but I probably shouldn't judge having not been there.

indiepanda Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As in she isn't going to see/talk to him for at

> least a week do you mean?


Yes indiepanda.

Which is a real pain imo as I've passed on the collective wisdom of this fine fora and(I think!) he accepts that he(or me) had not considered the salient point about the level of discomfiture that she would feel as Wifey1 knows that it was solely her decision for her not to come(remember Wifey1 had gone out of her way to gain entry for my M8 to go to her 2nd marriage! so feels particularly hurt) and so as Wifey2 realises she is "seen" as the "Bad Guy" and no Woman(in my experience) is going to be wanted to be seen in that light or be happy with it or tolerate it so the obvious answer is for her not to go to the Communal Couples Meal.

There's been a further development in that Wifey1/New Husband can't now go to the Communal Meal/Drinks as he has another engagement and they are both oblivious,totally unaware of the fact that Wifey2 won't be going.


Given that circumstance the way seems clear for:


1/ Wifey2 has had her "space" and makes contact.

2/ My M8 tells her that he can now understand her view(though he is irritated that she wouldn't admitin the first placeas that is the REAL reason why she does not want to attend the Communal Meal etc) and he apologies accordingly.

3/ She accepts it and they move on and "who knows" after the marriage she may feel happier and more relaxed about future gatherings if there is some time distance b4 the next one.


imo The longer she now leaves it to regain contact the worse it will be.

I forgot! there's now no reason for my M8 and Wifey2 not to go to Communal do but in the first couple of days he did contact her 2/3 times so,obviously,he has to respect her decision for "time and space" which is a pain as he wants to let her know that Wifey1 is not going to the Communal do!

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's an old plotline from Cold Feet, or perhaps

> Thirtysomething, isn't it? Where do I claim my

> prize?


Problem is both parties are currently getting Cold Feet about their future together...:'(

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps they should both have some space and a

> rethink,

>

> although the potential 'divorce move' seeems to

> have arrived a tad early,

>

> compared to most relationships I've known.


Sad but I guess it's much better to not go through with the wedding than make a terrible mistake.


Though I would have thought a proper heart to heart conversation was more useful than just "space". Without each other explaining how they really feel and what their intentions were, it so easy to end up completely misinterpreting each others actions, and then getting upset by the meaning each have placed on them.


If having had a proper talk about it, there's uncertainty about whether to carry on, then take the space then to think about it.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know you are the resident Mr Reasonable of the

> forum really.

>

> Og God, that may as well read "You are Mr boring"

> :-$


Sorry, that definately wasn't the way I meant it, you just come across as a chilled out and thoughtful sort of guy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Another strong recommendation from me from Peckham Rye area. Paul sent Damian to sort out our tripping sockets. We’d had another electrician come and try to fix it a couple of weeks earlier who was not good, but Damian was extremely thorough and methodical in diagnosing the issue and fixing it. He tested every socket to make sure the problem was sorted. He arrived bang on time and talked me through exactly what he was finding and how the problem had likely come about as he went. Very polite, friendly and excellent value for money. Wouldn’t hesitate to call them again if we need an electrician. Great team,  great service! Paul Edgley - Edgley Contracting - 07802 627967 - https://edgleycontracting.co.uk
    • So have you never been in a house where the gas hob was turned on but not ignited?  You get a smell of gas,  You do not get an explosion when you light the flame.   You have to have a very high concentration of methane (over 4.4%)  for this to happen, the smell of the gas would be obvious half way down the street.  They add mercaptans to natural gas to give it that smell at very low concentrations.   Gas explosions happen once in a blue moon, in places like residential homes in the basements where, if unchecked, a leak can get up to explosive concentrations.   Back to my original comment about Bunsen burners.  You'd got 30 kids in a classroom but no explosions.   The establishment of Corgi (now Gas Safe) and the compulsory annual testing of boilers and cookers was mainly due to the relatively high number of deaths from carbon monoxide poisoning from faulty appliances and blocked flues in rented properties. I don't expect the OP to test it themselves, I would, but that his my decision.  But you may get Natural Grid to do this free of charge if you ask nicely. I thought the video was hilarious.  The guy shouts don't do this yourself, call in help.    
    • Tom Noonan, just 74 https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/21/movies/tom-noonan-dead.html  https://variety.com/2026/film/reviews/remembering-tom-noonan-in-manhunter-michael-mann-1236668730/
    • Or maybe let @malumbu come round and test it for you, thus potentially getting two birds with one stone 🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...