Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Unfortunately I have discovered foxes have taken up residence in my rather large garden shed, they got in through quite a big hole in the roof and because boxes are piled up quite high in there, they have been using them to nip in and out of the roof. I only just discovered them (2 I think) over the last few weeks. It appears as though they have been there a while because when I opened the shed door they sat over in the far corner on a pile of old soft toys staring at me and it looked like they'd built quite a den. Who do I call to have them removed? Do the RSPCA deal with the removal of animals of this nature or is it a pest control problem, I don't want them hurt or exterminated even though I now they are classed as vermin, I just want them removed, am hoping to pull the shed down and rebuild it and get rid of the cr@p in there in the spring. Many thanks in advance for any info.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4877-rspca-or-pest-control-problem/
Share on other sites

Erm.... ok Keef ha!, got me a bit worried about your sanity there, then realised you were referring to another post! ha! Thought you were gonna say something along the lines of well nothing better than to let your ex see that you have let foxes move in on his turf, then remembered, I don't even have a signficant other half! ha!


Thanks for the advice anyways and for taking the time to answer XX


:))

Would you consider letting them stay till Spring? They breed up to Feb I think, but rest assured that foxes always have more than one den, so if you really want them out now, it's likely they will move on to another place they know...I would love to have foxes at the end of my garden!
Foxes are lovely creatures, but I have youngsters but believe me cleaning fox poop (because it is very distinctive smelling and runny) off of hands and faces when they fall into it is not a wonderous and joyous thing. I followed Keef's advice and got in touch with a local fox watch group from whom I purchased a product called "Scoot" which you mix with water and spray around and in the area they are staying. It makes them think that a bigger and badder fox has decided to move in on their territory and scent marked their dwelling and they move on and keep away from the area. Haven't gotten round do actioning yet but hope to do so soon.
Oh, is that why they make so much noise, I always thought they were fighting eachother or getting attacked by cats so would run out (or stick my head out of the window) and throw something at them or shooosh them very loudly, not knowing I've been interuppting their moonlight romantic trysts!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...