Jump to content

Richard and Andy( but Richard in particular)


streatham

Recommended Posts

We used Richard and Andy during the summer for a variety of small jobs.

Avoid Richard at all costs. He was a messy worker and most of the jobs he did had to be re-done as they were done carelessly and with little understanding of geometry or the basic principles of this type of work. Towards the end of the employment, as he was basically friendly and amenable we gave him payment before all the works were completed and of course he disappeared leaving work unfinished and bags of materials which we then had to dispose of. Despite numerous calls and messages left, he did not return to finish the work or return the money for the unfinished work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sorry to hear you were unhappy with the service I provided you. We were only paid for the work we completed and in fact did some jobs that were not charged for. We were made to wait for payment, and the materials left behind were paid for by yourselves and to take them would've been theft.


As you will see from the numerous other reviews and recommendations on the forum, I have many customers who are satisfied with the jobs I have done. I pride myself on being considerate of my environment and ensuring I clear up any mess made.


If any customers are disappointed or unhappy with my service, I am always more than happy to return and rectify any issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I tell you what, I've answered every question you've posed to me on this thread so far, so before you deflect any further, why don't you address the simple questions I've put to you several times first. Here, give them a go: Who has been pressurising the emergency services and how? Do you genuinely believe that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the square due to inadequate signage?  
    • Which original consultation?    Err be careful with the expert opinion and data part.....if you think the cycle lobby and Aldred et al is the sole source of sound opinion on such issues! 😉 And this is where they fell foul of the law and had to re-run the consultation. It actually casts huge doubt on a lot of previous consultations (including the latest DV one) as they do not pass the legal watermark because they do not provide a yes/no response. The council are terrified of a judicial review because, I suspect under legal advice, they know they cheated the system in many previous consultations. Do you remember when the council claimed they had a mandate for the CPZs because of some seriously dodgy research conducted with a large tranche of students in the north of the borough in 2018.....
    • Perhaps the issue is that Southwark don’t listen. They didn’t take account of responses. The proposed CPZs for west Dulwich  stopped when the Council was threatened with a judicial review. Not before. Whatever consultation process was worse than flawed with McAsh arguing that because they were in power, they had a mandate and didn’t need to listen to anyone’s views, rendering any democratic process void. The criteria for LTNs was high population density, high public transport usage and low car ownership so Dulwich Village was a perfect candidate…not. Just a coincidence but I believe some councillors live within the scheme 
    • We’re looking to buy a house in ED (3 Bed, 1,100 sq ft type). Quite a few we’ve found on Landells Road, Pellatt Road and Jennings Road are half houses. Does anyone have a view or any experiences of living/buying a half house?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...