Jump to content

Richard and Andy( but Richard in particular)


streatham

Recommended Posts

We used Richard and Andy during the summer for a variety of small jobs.

Avoid Richard at all costs. He was a messy worker and most of the jobs he did had to be re-done as they were done carelessly and with little understanding of geometry or the basic principles of this type of work. Towards the end of the employment, as he was basically friendly and amenable we gave him payment before all the works were completed and of course he disappeared leaving work unfinished and bags of materials which we then had to dispose of. Despite numerous calls and messages left, he did not return to finish the work or return the money for the unfinished work.

I am sorry to hear you were unhappy with the service I provided you. We were only paid for the work we completed and in fact did some jobs that were not charged for. We were made to wait for payment, and the materials left behind were paid for by yourselves and to take them would've been theft.


As you will see from the numerous other reviews and recommendations on the forum, I have many customers who are satisfied with the jobs I have done. I pride myself on being considerate of my environment and ensuring I clear up any mess made.


If any customers are disappointed or unhappy with my service, I am always more than happy to return and rectify any issues.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I completely agree with you . Its as if they have their foot in the door and are just pushing and pushing. It's ridiculous. It's not the right space. they clearly do not give any regard to the environment or they would move it.  
    • There's a great badminton club at the Harris girls academy. It runs Friday from 5.30 to 6.45. for more experienced players, they have sessions on Wednesday and Friday, too but that's subject to skill levels 
    • There seem to be all sorts of blocks for this event being mounted on the Common, one is that it was 'designed especially' for the current site, though the organisers seem to have had absolutely no problem rejigging their plans to the original site footprint to expand the event to what we had last year- which I think really imposed on a large part of the park and spoilt the feel. I would suggest pressing very hard for relocation to the Common ( also closer to transport links). There must be a way, surely? If not, then wholesale relocation to a more suitable venue. I just do not think the park should be subjected to a festival-goer footfall of 60,000 plus over the summer.
    • I absolutely will. Fed up of property developments that are funded from offshore investors and price out local people. Fed up of the demise of social rents and the growing crisis of families in bed and breakfast. Fed up of young people being unable to save deposits, start families and generally have the same security of tenure that previous generations had. So yes, I will drill down into the financing, affordability, where the properties aer being advertised for sale, and how many are genuinely for social rent. Otherwise, no opposition to redeveloping that site in that way. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...