Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Fabulous local MP is driving forward a measure to conceal MPs' expenses (i.e. to conceal that certain MP's fund pergolas and so forth at taxpayers' expense):


http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jan/16/mps-expenses-exemption


See this Facebook page (if you are a Facebooker) to find out more:

http://www.mysociety.org/2009/01/17/6-days-to-stop-mps-concealing-their-expenses/


or check out what the good folks at MySociety have posted on the issue:

http://www.mysociety.org/2009/01/17/6-days-to-stop-mps-concealing-their-expenses/


I'm all in favour of appropriate money being spent on things that are necessary to enable our representatives to do their jobs (in other words I'm not one of these obsessive 'small government' people) but I think there should be transparency to stop abuse.


Please do join the fray (e.g. write to your MP) if you agree. There's plenty of help around to help you e.g. Write To Them.

I can't say as there is any political party who represents my views if you go by their policies. Some parties do to some extent but no one enough that I really feel happy about voting for them. And then of course they rarely stick to their policies anyway if it suits them to do otherwise.


I think you get some people in politics who are genuinely there because they believe in what they stand for, but an awful lot of them just seem to be there because they love the power, forgetting they are meant to be there to serve us.


I still can't believe they are allowed to vote for their own pay increases. Surely it should be pegged in line with the average earnings index or some other objective measure - like average public sector pay award for example.

The problem with this forum is, that the users are so well informed and are able to bring the obnoxious behaviour of our


politicians right in your face so that I end up angrrrrry and upset by their bare faced, thick skinned, brass necked......


bunch of conniving...no good.......


A Limited company which makes profit has to produce accounts for all to see, and yet they go spending this money without


any accounting to anyone.


The damned sauce, I'm fuming.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Wow I had no idea they give you 5% in perfume for your accommodation. You're right, I need to travel more. 
    • Do none of you go abroad.  Tourist taxes are really common in continental Europe and do vary a lot city by city. They are collected by the hotels/rental apartments. They are usually a  tiny part of your holiday costs.  In Narbonne recently we paid €1.30 per person per night.  The next town we went to charge 80 cents per person per night. By comparison Cologne is 5% of your accomodation.
    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...