Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What's the fabulously posh one called, I think it's Cloe


"Ohhhh maaa goaaad, I woan't letccchhh yo dowaaaaan" in that slightly echoey, drawn out posh drawl


Just for that, she's in


Cheryl looks amazingly Cheryl like/ Tulisa looks tragicly 'clown like' bless her


Louis and Simon are just hilarious, in thier own weird way

chloe was in xfactor aaages ago, but all vidoes on youtube have mysteriously dissappeared, there is one of her on This Morning....same accent....


Siomn has so much botox he's become a Stepford Wife style simulcrum of Simon, Tulisa, why would you do that, you're young and beautiful albeit stupd and annoying, botox just doesn't make anyonme look good though does it. Horribly uncanny valley stuff.

On the posh accent barrometer


I think just like all accents are evolving here. That particular one is what I call "PR/PA Posh" and I hear it most in the Food PR industry


Conversely, in my other life, where I wear a 'design' hat, the posh accent is different. Higher, soft, less deep


Bloody good fun tho, either way

I wasn't seeing things was I ?


The boy from the boy band, wearing frames with no lenses in his specs


Hilarious propping, or fantastic anti-glare


And 'those girlz' with the doll vibe and the annnnnnooooyyyyyyinggg-g nasally accent, I shall miss them


"oh yeah, we're gonna carry on..."


Lastly, the one who scraped through, who is perfeft CBB's presenter material. I swear she mouthed "Oh f*ck I got through"


Haa...ha...it's fantasticly bonker crap TV and perfect as Winter closes in

Whilst Blonde Electra were perfomranig I waas reminded of Jim Hackers Party Political Broadcast.

If you have a radical agenda then you go for a staid, traditional formal backdrop, if you have nothing to say then you go with the dazzling new and exciting backdrop.


All those bright colours, dancing girls and elephants were making up for the fact that they weren't zany ata ll, thy were just boring.


Having said that I'd rather them than the girl that survived who won't last another wek anyway.


Stevie on the other hand...the new Wagner!!!

That may well be by thought a few of the acts were completely swamped by them too.


Anyway, early predictions for final 3?


Chloe will bomb out when they etll her to change her schtick and she tries to do a perky abba number.

So I'm thinking Itlain fella, maybe van driver and perhaps welsh bloke, geordie lass perhaps?


Fleur seemed an absolute natural, so that'll be week 3 then!!

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well, i guess when everybody knows its a pharrel

> williams cover, but when the judges say 'i love

> what you did with it Lauren, you really made it

> your own' i might feel a bit aggrieved too.


> Besides it was a 'what the faaa?' tweet, hardly a

> court summons.


Yeah, fair point. "It's a shit business".


She chose her primetime ratings side when she went on Doctor Who though. Perhaps ITV took it personally..?

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...