Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So we are buying a house.

It is a Victorian terrace that has had a loft extension and a side return done since the present owners moved in.

All of the surveyors we have contacted so far have refused a homebuyers survey and said we need a structural survey.

Is this wise advise? Likely to save money in the long run? Or just a money grabbing exercise? Having already paid for one structural survey on a different property ( Georgian terrace so it felt more

Necessary) I am reluctant to spend another thousand pounds....


Wise forumites - advise me!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/50504-homebuyers-versus-structural/
Share on other sites

Although in 99% of cases it'll be alright - Mad not too - IMO. just insurance against the horror stories of those that tried to do it on the cheap. Plus does tend to show things that you should also think about getting on with first in terms of maintenance and keeping an eye on too (ie it has some other value too) and can be used to reduce price if something needs doing.
Rule of thumb I read years ago was that if it's over 100 years old, always have a full structural survey done, less than that and you can probably get away with a homebuyer's if it appears to be in good condition. I had a full one done for the flat I bought in a Victorian property in ED - I can't see why you wouldn't if the property is old, whether it's a house or a flat.

I would have thought that the only reason why a homebuyers report might be thought acceptable for a flat is just the practical reality of not being able to carry out a full structural - if you can't get access to all the other flats and the loft space, back garden etc, the surveyor/engineer can't describe it as a 'full' structural.


I'd always have a full structural for a house, even if brand new (perhaps more so). The cost is a very small percentage of what it might cost if you've bought a dud. A homebuyers report doesn't really tell you anything more than what you can see for yourself (assuming you've owned a home before and have a basic understanding of general maintenance)- now that does seem a waste of money.

I had a full structural done on a house when I moved here, and they still failed to pick up on a few things. If there are fitted carpets they usually have a get out clause to say they couldn't inspect the floors underneath them. Most people aren't going to accept having their fitted carpets uplifted to do a full inspection.


But, I still think I would have another one done were I to buy another house.

For a rare lifetime transaction of this size I would go structural too. But my experience is that most will simply trundle out a standard format with some paragraphs to customise it. Many also skip inspecting the roof or sub floor for health and safety or access reasons....so you have to ask specifically if you want these inspected properly.


Good ones will pick things up you didn't notice...stuff that you could use in negotiations if you wanted to. The main things to look out for at survey are the state of the roof, any water/flood damage from leaking pipes, roof or boiler, dry and wet rot and general signs of movement / subsidence (e.g. uneven floors, window frames, cracks greater than 5mm etc. Also general state of the windows and the boiler as replacing both is always an expense.


Good luck.

I know I'm on my own here, but I think that all house surveys are a complete waste of time. Anything they tell you is usually based solely on a 'visual inspection' - which basically means that unless there is something obvious (which you would normally pick up on your own anyway), they add nothing. They'll say things like "there should be a steel here, it's not possible to say if there is or not without disturbing the fabric, but we suggest you get it checked". Yeah, thanks.

I'm an estate agent (hear me out!) though not locally based for work which is Chelsea where no one gets a survey!


As a rule of thumb which I've applied each time I've bought and sold as well is that a homebuyers is plenty unless a) you're aware of issues with the house, or b) the homebuyers flags up something which needs further investigations.


If you're getting a mortgage, your bank's survey will also have comments about the property and they are within their rights to request more investigatory work, down value the property or issue a retention if there is a major problem.


Surveys are by their nature designed to find out any upcomg problems in the property so expect some structural movement (historical- London is full of clay soil which expands and contracts and this causes movement), some damp (kenwood will do a free quote to ascertain further costs) and caution advised re gas and electrics (as surveyors generally arent qualified to give assurances for such).


Good luck with the purchase! X

Thank you dear forumites.

We are going with the structural option. Though I've read all the comments with interest. Curious that no one in Chelsea does surveys...do they simply already know they can afford to fix any problems?


I will be advertising my one of my kidneys in the for sale section shortly....

  • 3 months later...
If I was buying a house now which had potential 'movement' issues giving me concern, I'd find a private surveyor (not one the lender or EA recommends) and get a 'the one in the middle' type survey (whatever you call that now) and spend the extra on getting a structural engineer (ie someone who actually knows rather than just guessing) around to look at the important stuff.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...