Jump to content

Trains from East Dulwich (seem to be terrible)


Gardenia

Recommended Posts

@Lowlander - the jubilee extension was an particularly complex and expensive extension - passing under the river several times and ran over budget. The projected cost of extending Bakerloo all the way to Hayes is ?2-3B.

So between the ridiculous two stop extension of the northern line to subsidise a development of luxury flats, the dangleway, the garden bridge and the 'boris bus' - we could probably drum up more than enough to provide transport improvements for existing communities in SE London (who are after all contributing the money used to fund Boris' schemes).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MarkE Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One downside is that presumably their next phase

> will shut off Platforms 8 and 9, meaning that the

> footbridge will go out of action.


I just checked with the people at the Thameslink Programme and they've confirmed that this is indeed the case - from January, Platforms 8 and 9 will be out of action, as will the steps to the footbridge from Platform 8, meaning that to get to 1-7 will require routing out of the station and then back in (without being charged twice for your PAYG journey).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MarkE Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I just checked with the people at the Thameslink

> Programme and they've confirmed that this is

> indeed the case - from January, Platforms 8 and 9

> will be out of action, as will the steps to the

> footbridge from Platform 8, meaning that to get to

> 1-7 will require routing out of the station and

> then back in (without being charged twice for your

> PAYG journey).


That is so ridiculous, it's *almost* funny. So things set to get significantly worse then basically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> MarkE Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > I just checked with the people at the

> Thameslink

> > Programme and they've confirmed that this is

> > indeed the case - from January, Platforms 8 and

> 9

> > will be out of action, as will the steps to the

> > footbridge from Platform 8, meaning that to get

> to

> > 1-7 will require routing out of the station and

> > then back in (without being charged twice for

> your

> > PAYG journey).

>

> That is so ridiculous, it's *almost* funny. So

> things set to get significantly worse then

> basically.



I'm surprised that they've not been willing/able to set up a temporary bridge, but given the volumes transferring between platforms perhaps it was considered impractical. I actually would rather the solution they're going with than squeezing through the gap at Platform 8 which is already quite crushed at times.


The next phase (Christmas to Easter) is also the beginning of the blockade, and in fact Platforms 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 will all be shut and there'll be no connection to Charing Cross.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I can recommend Leon from Electrical Initiative hands down. He’s efficient, always gives a specific time slot, is punctual and does a great job. He’s been on my contact list for the last eight years, and any electrical work he is the first person I call.
    • I remember some old threads about this and have just checked. Use the search function, type in half Houses and there are 3 old threads. 2 of them have specific titles, freehold and water supply.
    • 57% of those who actually lived in the consultation area I believe. Around 3,000. Presumably 2,000 of whom are the ‘supporters of One Dulwich (but not members of One Dulwich? So how does one ‘join’?) It seems fairly clear that Southwark could have done more first time round as they did open the junction back up to emergency services. I’m not sure why this suggests someone shawdowy is ‘pulling their strings’ though as you suggest. You say read up on it - why not share the evidence that emergency services were knocking on the council’s door for months and months?  You’ve just posted a claim the the LFB haven’t been consulted this time round, yet their spokesman says  “Regarding the FOI, the local authority did consult the Brigade. However, they didn’t initially contact the specific Southwark team, who responded on the FOI saying they hadn’t been contacted.” I have answered all your questions (where they are actual questions). You ducked and deflected my two for several pages, before awkwardly distancing yourself from the claims made in the missive you shared 😳 A question that says “do you agree with a design that does nothing to stop persistent number plate covering offenders” is what’s called a loaded question. Whether one say yes or no it accepts the premise. It’s the classic ‘have you stopped beating your wife” construction, and it’s not very subtle. 🙄    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...