Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know it's 100 yards outside SE22, but does anyone know what the story is with the detached house in front of the second Charter School entrance (next to St Faiths), that's been boarded up for years? I'm just wondering if Charter has its eye on that plot of land for future expansion.

I'm not sure what Charter would do with it - the site is big for a house, but probably not big enough for any school building. I also very much doubt Charter would get the money - as a property I'm sure it's worth well over 2mil (the hospital is a new school so funding is different).

Most likely it will end up being redeveloped for new housing at some point...

Contact the Diocese of Southwark's Property Department http://www.southwark.anglican.org/contacts/email.php?id=107 to find out what the issues are, and their long term intention for the vicarage site. They're the ones who will know.


Don't forget to report back.

They applied to a build a 2 storey new vicarage plus 2 x 3 storey detached houses .


Refused in Oct 2012 on grounds that it would lead to a visually cramped overdevelopment of the site ,harmful and out of character with the streetscene and because the development didn't adequately address the impact on an existing Plane Tree .http://planningonline.southwark.gov.uk/DocsOnline/Documents/254391_1.pdf


Apparently the applicant appealed against the refusal ,*lost the appeal and a claim for costs . Interesting argument about the TPO'd Plane tree that had been felled before the planning application but resprouted and awarded a second TPO .http://planningonline.southwark.gov.uk/DocsOnline/Documents/325167_1.pdf


*sorry ,major error on my part ,applicant WON the appeal and was granted planning permission . They lost the request for costs of the appeal .


I'm sure Robin -rch on the forum - will have been well acquainted with the application .

The boarded up house isn't in front of The Charter School anyway as the OP put it.


It's always been part of St Faith's as far as I've remembered and just because a vicar becomes less able or too ill to carry on why should it become prime land? Maybe the current vicar lives off-site but I hope it becomes part of something the community could benefit from.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Week 5 fixtures...   Saturday 20th September Liverpool v Everton Brighton & Hove Albion v Tottenham Hotspur Burnley v Nottingham Forest West Ham United v Crystal Palace Wolverhampton Wanderers v Leeds United Manchester United v Chelsea Fulham v Brentford   Sunday 21st September AFC Bournemouth v Newcastle United Sunderland v Aston Villa Arsenal v Manchester City
    • Given the late Queen's reported opinion of Trump I think she would have been quietly amused https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/aug/20/very-rude-the-late-queens-salty-verdict-on-donald-trump
    • Are you Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells?
    • The OP might have found the ‘Creative Trump’ protests entertaining but I found them very disrespectful to our late and great Queen Elizabeth who was interred at Windsor Castle 3 years ago.  They would have had more impact on projecting the images at Chequers today. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...