Jump to content

Franca Manca


Ladysaw

Recommended Posts

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Would fit in with normal 12.00 - 2.00 lunch

> break.

>

> Yes exactly.

>

> Which 3pm wouldn't. So I'm not sure quite what

> point you are trying to make here?!


Not trying to make any point.


Just an observation after you had made the point of it being empty at 3.00pm which I would expect.



DF

simonstephens Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I like Franco Manca, it's really decent pizza.

>

> However, please can we make sure we don't forget

> the wonderful Il Mirto on Melbourne Grove? I've

> eaten a hell of a lot of FM and it just doesn't

> beat this family-run Sardinian gem. It's so

> unpretentious and the food is nothing short of

> exquisite. Still very reasonably priced too, AND

> BYO on a Wednesday.

>

> Go to Franco Manca, but don't forget Il Mirto ?

> it's way more legit. Plus you won't have to queue!


I absolutely LOVE Il Mirto, I sincerely hope it won't be forgotten as it is a true gem of a place. Their pasta is amazing too. Hope there is room for all the fine places in the area offering good pizza (The Gowlett also) and good luck to the new branch of Franca Manca too.

cella Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue

> As I suggested previously, it is not always

> necessary for you to have the last word.



WTF?


Yes, you suggested that previously on a thread about a man who had sadly killed himself. Somebody clearly felt that your comment was inappropriate and removed it.


What exactly do you have against me, Cella?


Foxy and I are neighbours and know each other off the forum.


Please share with me and others on here why you are choosing to publicly attack me in this manner, thanks.


Meantime, I shall continue to post exactly what I please, provided what I post is within the rules of the forum.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The interplay between Sue and Foxy.....I reckon

> there's a simmering sexual tension there.



:)) :)) :))


Not!


ETA: Anyway, don't want to get this lounged, so (apart from my keenly anticipated reply from Cella) let's return to discussing the food, vibe and rammed-ness or lack of it at certain times of Franco Manca :)


ETA: Oh, oops, if nobody else posts after this I shall be accused of "having the last word" again. Duh.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...