Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If you read the whole story they are suggesting that Central London property values will decline in the first half of 2015 due to uncertainty pre-election re mansion tax, but then recover in second half to be flat overall for the year. Presumably the second half recovery is dependent on a not-Labour victory in the election. Then it says:


?Suburban London [that's us, I guess] is expected to be impacted as the rapid growth seen in 2014 slows, helping to rebalance supply and demand. Caution before the polls suggests that prices will be flat for the first half of the year, before rising modestly by year end,?


So it's a kind of 'no news' news story, other than an implied dig at the mansion tax. Re good thing/bad thing, at the properly macro level the best solution to high London house prices is a booming economy in the other regions of the UK, but obviously easier said than done. In the mean time, there's an obvious need to build more homes in London and the SE.

Read something the other day that there is now a modest trend of people in their 30s moving to other urban centres raht er then the burb or commuter belt. Small beginnings perhaps, but can only be good in the long run for londoners and the economy as a whole if sustained.

If you exclude speculators, only people who would benefit from house price increases are people who plan to go to live in cheaper areas, e.g. they are looking to retire in the country or planning to go to live in a cheaper country.


For everyone else, I can't see how this can benefit them.


And btw, just look at the high streets of places with more expensive real estate - that would simply mean good bye independent shops.

Salsaboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hahahahaha.....

>

>

> jj2 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> if Labour wins the elections...


http://www.oddschecker.com/politics/british-politics/next-uk-general-election/most-seats

jj2 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you exclude speculators, only people who would benefit from house price increases are people who

> plan to go to live in cheaper areas


But decreases can affect non-speculators as well, leaving them in negative equity and unable to move. Plus the added knock on effects on the economy, pension pots, etc, etc. 'Decrease' can be just as bad as 'increase', sometime worse.

jj2 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you exclude speculators, only people who would

> benefit from house price increases are people who

> plan to go to live in cheaper areas,


Eh - the more the house is worth, then the more you are worth. Anyone with a house and is not intending ever to move again is better off and possibly happier. Also you can take out additional borrowings when the value goes up allowing you to improve/extend.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Eh - the more the house is worth, then the more you are worth.


Technically yes...but you still need somewhere to live and excluding the primary home from any "net worth" calculation is always sound practice for personal finance. if you exclude your home what other assets do you have? People usually go quiet at that point. An inflated sense of "net worth" linked to housing is responsible for influencing spending psychology in many other areas. Scary when you think about it.

  • 2 weeks later...

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd bet on Labour + Nationalist coalition at the moment.


That's a constitutional crisis in the making. The SNP has long had a convention that they will not vote in Westminster on issues that only affect England. That could leave Labour with a coalition majority on UK issues, but a minority on English issues.


The Lib Dems would be needed as well. They should still have about 20 MPs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...