Jump to content

Head Teacher appointed for The Charter School East Dulwich


Recommended Posts

I'm delighted that the TCED has moved so quickly. I congratulate them on this. Working with the EFA and NHS Property will be a very demanding role and the mix of school leadership, project management skills and experience sounds a wise balance for this role.

As someone who has had several careers each benefiting from earlier ones I can see no problem in our new head having experience in the financial sector.


I trust TCS teams judgement in making this appointment. They clearly put together the best application for our new secondary school and I have no doubt they've chosen the best candidate for this new headship role.


I wonder whether the second coming would have made people happy with this appointment!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James - I think people have a right to have a say on a public forum about the new head- as it was the this community that signed petitions etc etc.


I certainly raised an eyebrow when I heard 5 years experience, think a lot would....doesn't mean he wont get support but everyone has a right to voice concerns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearly as a Lib Dem I defend the right to free speach.

But the implied assumption The Charter School can't have made the right candidate choice isn't fair. They had all the facts and we don't.

When people google search TCSED in the future this will all pop up which will make the job harder convincing paretns to put our new secondary school as their first choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But James, the google search argument is a specious one - by that rationale, none of us should ever post anything discursive or questioning about our local schools, in case of future googlers?! Anyone considering the school as a first choice will want to hear all views, I'd have thought.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not all people who work or worked in banks are inhumane... Quite a few are very nice, normal and community-spirited. Really... (No, I'm not a banker.) It's certainly not fair to generalise based on one bad experience. And I know a lot of Charter parents who are extremely happy with the new head. My children are not at secondary school yet so I can't speak from direct experience.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jimthebuilder, you can't judge current head on current results. He has been in post for a year and a bit, current results will be based on leadership of the old head.


As for staff leaving, welcome to London - people get promoted, move to better jobs, relocate to the 'burbs. We should expect staff turnover. I have worked in education for many years and it rarely happens that people leave because they "can't work with the new guy"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems an odd decision to appoint Alex Crossman given he did not even hold QTS in 2012. He has never taught a normal timetable.


To suggest he was on the senior team at Charter in 2012 is not being totally truthful. He was placed onto it in 2012 as part of his training after moving from banking. He held no responsibilities and was not accountable as part of that team


So in fact he has 3 years experience in teaching full stop. All of which has been at the level of Vice Principal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There is no equivalence between One Dulwich purporting to be a local organisation speaking for local people, and actually properly constituted organisations such as The Dulwich Society. A 3 -second google search reveals the openly published names of the trustees of Dulwich Society, so I can make my own mind up as to whether these individuals are coming at local issues with a particular slant. I can read minutes of their meetings online, and whilst I might not agree with their every position, I can have confidence that they are an open and fundamentally democratic institution. There is absolutely nothing similar in terms of publicly accountable information to be found about One Dulwich - no idea of who is behind it, who pays for it ( it is clearly expensive), and on what basis they make their decisions.  Given the Police involvement in the intimidation of people with a public pro-LTN view ( for which there is no equivalence in terms of severity of any incident for those with an anti-LTN point of view), I can fully understand why, for Dulwich Society's traffic sub- committee only, they want a bit of online anonymity. I also find it slightly disturbing that when The Dulwich Society current leadership asked the 'grouping' pushing for changes within it for a meeting to discuss their concerns, they refused it. Given the recent experiences of organisations such as The National Trust, the question can be asked - is something similar going on here?   
    • I’ll post it to the DVLA if i don’t find the owner by midweek. 
    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...