titch juicy Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Mick Mac Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> Legally - for the purposes of this case - she> consented. End of.That's my thinking. It just seems that the media and a good proportion of the public, represented on here, still want to find him guilty. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/53053-ched-evans-situation/page/17/#findComment-1061553 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huggers Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Otta Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> Huggers Wrote:> --------------------------------------------------> -----> > She'd fallen over in the takeaway. left her> > handbag there. That is pretty drunk. The room> was> > dark. She may not even have known a second man> was> > having sex with her. Maybe that was part of> their> > 'joke'in 'bagging a drunk one'.> > > But he can't have known about what happened in the> take away.> > Don't want to sound like I'm defending the sleaze> bag, just find the whole thing grim yet> interesting.the CTV shows him passing her as she was fallen on the floor although neither he nor her could remember that in court. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/53053-ched-evans-situation/page/17/#findComment-1061580 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loreda Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 HelloFor anyone interestedhttps://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/169433https://www.gofundme.com/help-ched-evans-complainant-2uj5pv8?rcid=a9dd64fa93e311e6b6a4bc764e04c5a7 Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/53053-ched-evans-situation/page/17/#findComment-1063306 Share on other sites More sharing options...
P.O.U.S.theWonderCat Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 Mick Mac Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> Legally - for the purposes of this case - she> consented. End of. Er, no, that's not what the case determined. The verdict means that there was not sufficient evidence to determine either that she hadn't consented or that he didn't believe she had consented.Her consent wasn't proven to have happened.Statements like this show exactly why this case is highly worrying. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/53053-ched-evans-situation/page/17/#findComment-1063364 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now