Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In 2012, Charlie Hebdo magazine published more cartoons of the prophet Muhammad, including images of him naked, and a cover showing him being pushed along in a wheelchair by an Orthodox Jew. The French government had appealed to the editors not to go ahead with publication, and shut down embassies, cultural centres and schools in 20 countries out of fear of reprisals when they went ahead anyway.


Riot police were also deployed to the Charlie Hebdo offices to protect it from direct attacks. The foreign minister, Laurent Fabius, publicly criticised the magazine?s actions asking: ?Is it really sensible or intelligent to pour fuel on the fire??


G?rard Biard, the editor-in-chief, rejected the criticism. ?We?re a newspaper that respects French law,? he said. ?Now, if there?s a law that is different in Kabul or Riyadh, we?re not going to bother ourselves with respecting it.?

ernesto Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> StraferJack Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Some of the victims not even that I'd bet

> >

> > I've seen several calls for every newspaper to

> > print the cartoon tomorrow on the front page -

> > here's hoping

>

>

> This will hardly help



Agreed.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Some of the victims not even that I'd bet

>

> I've seen several calls for every newspaper to

> print the cartoon tomorrow on the front page -

> here's hoping


How will that help things? I'm all for freedom of speech and expression...but this would surely fan the flames...

Dear god?! Seriously? You don't get that response?


It says, proudly, we will not be cowed. We will not be initimated by your acts of violence. We will defeat you not by a machine gun but by freedom of speech. There are many of us. You are few. That you do not represent Islam and take your prophets name in vain when committing these acts.


If we stop publishing these things, because of "offence", because of consequences like this, terrorism wins. And we all lose.

Its hardly a relevation, but if you print you have a responsibility & there can be consequences- legitimate or not


France is fairly unique in europe with its policies regarding islam and its appalling history in Muslim countries, not to mention the tinderbox of its banlieues


This is a country that has had a institutionally racist RW political structure ( dont bother stating that Islam is not a race strawman), a country that formally acknowledged the Armenian geniocide to piss off Turkey.


This is an appaling and unforgiveable act, but lets not get into a hate spiral- this wont benefit anyone

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dear god?! Seriously? You don't get that

> response?

>

> It says, proudly, we will not be cowed. We will

> not be initimated by your acts of violence. We

> will defeat you not by a machine gun but by

> freedom of speech. There are many of us. You are

> few. That you do not represent Islam and take your

> prophets name in vain when committing these acts.

>

> If we stop publishing these things, because of

> "offence", because of consequences like this,

> terrorism wins. And we all lose.



It insults all Islam, even the peaceful bits - the potrayal of the prophet/god in any human form, so it's a gross insult to all muslims.


Now, it's all a load of medieval tosh IMO but that's the issue with all papers doing it

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Those ?consequences? would be far less likely if

> the gunmen knew every paper would be doing the

> same thing

>

> Those ?consequences? are far more likely to be

> repeated if their insane demands are accepted


SJ, you are an intelligent man. You know how these groups function and what their aim is - this isnt a new concept- the attack is an action , the resultant fallout is the aim

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ernesto Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > a country that formally acknowledged the

> Armenian

> > geniocide to piss off Turkey.

>

> Or, alternatively, because it actually happened.


NO one doubts that, but why would France take effectively unilateral action to formalise this act ? think of the result, not the act.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The "consequences" are a blasphemous and deep

> insult against all practising muslims. Foook the

> terrorists.


exactly.


Tit for tat on something like this - provoking a dangerous response resulting in likely harm to innocent people caught in the middle - sends out all the wrong kind of messages IMO

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I suppose all these issues that need addressing are a reflection of the times we live in. Important and necessary but somehow destroy the underlying spirit.
    • Do you know who organised and ran it? Because it must have been quite a lot of work. Who kept track of the credits? What safeguards were they? Was there a lower age limit eg over 18? Was insurance needed? ID? Who checked it? What was the situation if somebody was injured while working in your house or garden? What if someone broke or stole something? What if someone in your house was molested or attacked? What if you weren't happy with the standard of work? Sorry to be gloomy, but whilst this sounds a great idea in theory, in common with many people I know I've had several  bad experiences with supposedly professional tradespeople, let alone someone who wasn't doing it for a living.
    • I think the Brixton Pound lives on, so there must be some kind of appetite for it, but I'm afraid I doubt it would be very useful for me.
    • My primary issue is the noise level and the fact that it begins at dusk and continues well into the early hours, the odd random bang being possibly the worst aspect as you never know when the next volley will occur. This is no longer about celebrating a turning point as the clock strikes 12am, but more a lengthy indulgence in ear shattering bangs, where there also seems to be competition as to who can create the loudest most startling barrage of sustained noise. A new thing is daytime fireworks, where buyers are urged to forget the visual aspect and focus on getting the biggest bang for their buck. I am lucky as I am not super sensitive to noise but I really feel for those who are. As for pets, I am afraid there are now many that require serious medication to get them through- and those meds are not cheap. The fault here is not with the animals or people sensitive to extreme bangs, but with those who insist on their right to impose it on all around them, not just for half an hour a few times a year, but for hours on customary dates and now  spreading to random events throughout the year.I  New Year fireworks is a very recent construct, and now Halloween Fireworks are becoming a thing. Why should we encourage and condone a proliferating societal noise addiction? It really is isn't healthy. Let those who wish to damage their eardrums enjoy their pastime through headphones; they can turn the volume up as high as they like.  If last night was the end of it then that is great but I think there'll be more through the weekend and more discarded jumbo firework boxes dumped in the park. I hope we follow other countries in adopting low noise fireworks and drone shows instead.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...