Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm curious to know what people think about the use of emotional support dogs. It appears that they can be taken on planes (inside the cabins) and into restaurants. There doesn't appear to be any hard and fast rules from the government regarding this. So, are you happy to share your space with dogs in these situations?

ARE EMOTIONAL SUPPORT DOGS RECOGNISED AS ASSISTANCE DOGS?

No, emotional support dogs are not required to undergo any specialised training and are not recognised in any region of the world as being assistance dogs. The worldwide body representing assistance dog programmes, Assistance Dogs International, does not classify emotional support dogs as assistance dogs. As a result, the owners of emotional support dogs are not entitled to claim their dogs have public access rights in the UK under the grounds of ?reasonable adjustments? that apply to assistance dogs. This includes airline travel.


Taken from Assistance Dog UK website.

This was one of my favourite news stories last year:

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/11/30/travel/emotional-support-pig-booted-flight/


I think dogs are okay - as long as they have been trained in the same manner as guide dogs. Not just some over-pampered pooch in a handbag - whatever happened to good old fashioned valium?


But I would draw a line at a pig!

Emotional support dogs don't need to be specially trained so they are basically your common or garden hound. I was just reading a forum where quite a few people have had to endure having their allergies set off on planes and enclosed spaces by these so called emotional support dogs.

It seems to be popular in the US but we don't, as yet, buy into it over here. A friend of a friend is over here from the US, the dog got to fly inside the cabin on the way over and then was allowed to take it into a restaurant last night.


Whilst I appreciate that dogs do offer emotional support I'm not sure on whether I think they should be allowed into eateries and particularly on planes disregarding others feelings because of their personal needs.

I think that might rather depend on the level of need? Pampered pooch in a handbag is really not the same as a person whose life is considerably enriched by a support dog, or who is enabled to do things that they might otherwise not be able to?


And the affect on others similarly needs to be measured - for example I don't much care if you think they are unhygienic or you don't like them if they are doing measurable good, but I would be far more sympathetic to someone who has a bad allergy or asthma.


Perhaps a definition of exactly what we are talking about would be helpful?


By way of example, if there was a sensible way of registering these dogs so that the system is not abused, I would support a person recovering from depression using this method:


http://dogsfordepression.org.uk/how-dogs-help-us.html

Eventually an airline will ban a dog, then someone will go to the disability rights commission and say mental health is as much a disability as blindness (it can be), and then it will go to court.


My immediate response was "what a load of old bollocks". But then I started thinking why are guide dogs allowed, and the answer is that without them a visually impaired person would be denied access. But if a person with mental health issues is unable to function without the "support" of their pooch, then I guess I have some sympathy.


It definitely needs to involve proper training for both dog and owner by an equivalent organisation to GDBA.

Otta - I'd agree. Unchecked and untrained it's open to abuse and also might be of dubious help. But registered/organised/recognised properly seems acceptable? Which is what that particular organisation seems to want too (I haven't looked at others).
I think "Emotional Support" Dogs would just become enablers and make their owners selfish and uncaring, immune to the feelings of fellow travellers. I favour a more stoic approach and would be happier with "Don't Do That" Daschunds who would sit staring at their owners and, every now and then, shaking their heads very slowly.

I think it depends on what the dog is emotionally supporting.


If the person can't cope with everyday situations without the dog then it should be allowed to go everywhere with them in order to give quality of life.


If the person can manage to do things on their own then maybe they only need to be emotionally supported at home.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.assistancedogs.org.uk/member-organisati

> ons/#supportdogs

>

> they do seem to be trained

>

>

> Assistance dogs are trained but not emotional support dogs.

>

>

> https://supportdogs.org.uk/

Have seen pictures and articles about two married actors, Channing and Jenna Tatum. They have what they call an emotional assistance dog which they take on the plane with them. When it travels on the plane it wears some sort of jacket, but when they are pictured with it not at airports, it doesn't have the jacket which makes me think the jacket is worn to convince the airline to allow them to fly with it in the cabin.


Apparently it's very easy to buy jackets for the dogs online, and in the States no one can ask many questions about what duties the dog performs for the owners as it would be illegal to do so. Hence lots of disruptive dogs are allowed into shops that should not be there.

I feel a bit sad when I read threads like this. Basically, if someone really gets genuine help from something like a dog, what harm is there is a bit of live and let live?


I mean, unless you are terrified or allergic, why is one persons inconvenience or dislike of something more important than someone else's comfort or happiness? You might think it's excessive or daft or indulgent, but it's not exactly hurting anyone, is it?


Yes, register, have some sensible framework, and so on. But if you cope much better with life when you are accompanied by a dog/enormous hat/music in your ears/only wearing yellow, then what the heck. Do your thing. I'm struggling to see either what the problem is, or frankly why it's any of my business.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You implied he did a good job in your first paragraph when you said you would have hated to see Corbyn lead the country through Covid - the alternative being Johnson, presumably? With the results we all saw. Unite - you have a problem with unions? Who work hard to see that their members get a fair deal in their workplace? How exactly are these people and groups "all as bad as each other"? In what way? Labour "purging their party of the far-left" has given us a weak prime minister who has apparently deserted any "left" (aka caring for other people and having decent moral principles) leanings he ever had. Which is why people appear to be leaving Labour in droves and voting, or intending to vote, Green or Lib Dem. Starmer has shot himself in the foot, in my opinion. But what would I know.
    • I think you need to get a grip If it's who I am thinking of, she's a young black girl in her twenties, has braids with bright colours through them and - I suspect - works with her father. It's always the same man behind the wheel and he's older than her, always in the same van, so I'm assuming it's a father-daughter combo which, if it is, I think is rather sweet.  They hustle hard in a job that is poorly paid, has little prospects, is relentless and thankless. The fact that they have stuck it out since the pandemic says a lot about them.  I think she's a lovely girl, who's perhaps a little shy - but she'll smile or chat back if you make the effort with her. And I admire her for sticking with that job for so long. Perhaps she's just one of these people who's naturally a bit clumsy or bashes things, the same way some people are heavy on their feet when they walk. But I wouldn't dream of jeopardising her job because she closes the slams the gate and doesn't 'kiss' the ring doorbell with her fingers.  Perhaps she's being passive aggressive because you are. And perhaps she also wishes she got to spend her time worrying about potential damage to her letterbox or her gate.  As for your gate / letterbox - you're talking about hypotheticals. Has there been any damage? No. Then go and live your life and worry about it when it happens.  (apols we have the wrong person, but some of my points still stand). 
    • Greg did an amazing job! He built a cabinet in my living room and added shelving. A lovely guy and perfectionist who goes the extra mile. He really understands what you want and comes up with various options to meet your price range. Would highly recommend!
    • I love the fact that virtually everyone held their hands out when furlough payments were made yet can't equate massive debt with massive cash payments to keep the economy ticking over.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...