Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I cannot believe that all government buildings and Buckingham Palace are flying flags at half mast (in addition to David Cameron and Prince Charles flying out to Saudi) in order to show solidarity with a vicious dictatorship. Does anyone feel differently? What the hell is going on?

Saudi Arabia is Brutal regime where Men women and children are flogged on a daily basis.


Hangings, Beheadings and Beatings (Lashing)..


Even Stoning to death but more rarer these days.. since 2007.


Yet GB and many other countries have given Saudi Arabia

their blessing and continue to trade with them..


What price Oil. ?


Much info available on Google but far too disturbing to post here.


DulwichFox

It's not about oil as such, it's about arms sales. We are one of the world's biggest producers and sellers of arms (in the top four no less) and Saudi is our biggest customer. This homage to the king's death is about business, and business doesn't care about human rights.

I don't know enough about it to really comment, but someone on the radio was suggesting that the human rights atrocities are more to do with the religious leaders that the royal family.


Like I say, I don't know too much about it, but it was another viewpoint.

FWIW I wrote elsewhere:

Are we junkies who hate the pusher but love the drug?


Of course King Abdullah was a ghastly and inhumane leader of a corrupt and vicious dynasty, but I wonder if our fawning politicians and royals (and those of dozens of other countries) are, in fact, a lightning rod for our own hypocrisy.


Our civilisation could not exist without copious quantities of cheap fossil fuels, not just for transportation, heating and power, but for large-scale agriculture, plastics, fabrics and a multitude of uses for which there are no viable alternatives ? at least not ones which would keep us in the comfort to which we've become accustomed. And, of course, Saudi Arabia is and has been for some time the world's no. 1 oil producer and will be for decades to come.


Not only that, but the UK's massive arms sales to Saudi Arabia means tens of thousands of hi-tech ? and ordinary ? jobs in the UK. So the blatant corruption associated with these deals is seen by politicians, however cynically, as smoothing the way to ensure that these jobs and skills are safe. The UK arms industry is responsible for some 22% of world 'defence' exports, employing some 300,000 people here and constituting more than 10% of our manufacturing industry.


Yes, it's horrible, but if we have a hopeless addiction to oil, it's not much use complaining that our 'pusher' is a violent and evil crook. And if we rid ourselves of our oil addiction (never mind our reliance on arms sales), we will make ourselves poorer. Are we prepared to accept that?

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well they took out Saddam and Gadafi so why not

> this mob ?


In short, because this lot have more money. If we started taking out people merely because they were murderous, slave-trafficking scum, half the developments in London would still be on the drawing board, and the City would have to find an honest way to make a living.

Good post BNG and of course there is some truth to this. There is a degree of necessary compromise and Real Politik, but we are talking about trade with the Saudis, not charity from them.. Both parties get something from these contracts, we don't need to fawn, as if we owe them something. World 'leaders' could actually come together and demand change far more forcefully. The behaviour this week has been cowardly and shameful.

The fear from the West, though, is that should they criticise or undermine the Saud regime, any internal uprising would destabilise the oil markets.


The West's nightmare scenario is a anti-Western theocracy taking over in Saudi. Remember that bin-Laden was a relative of the Saudi royal family who renounced them for allowing US forces into Saudi as part of Gulf War I.


A Saudi Arabia that doesn't sell oil at cheap rates or buy western arms is a terrifying prospect for those concerned.

Sa still produce at less than $5 a barrel or whateves - cheapest around- they can wing low oil prices until everyone else has dropped out. Indigenous US oil production is its death throes, not much left, hard to get. expensive to get out - hence the move towards shale and biomass based alternates. UK is stuffed and Thatch spunked the proceeds when it was affordable ( little bit of politics there) , now its nowhere near competitive


truth is, there isnt anyone who can compete on reserve or extraction price with the wahhabi wankers and they know it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...