Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Have admitted defeat and am looking to purchase an MPV. I gather that this Citroen has won lots of awards but does anyone have any personal experience of this model - positives / negatives? Or does anyone have any recommendations of other MPV's they have owned. Any feedback much appreciated as it is quite an outlay and want to have as much information as possible.


Many thanks

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/53746-citroen-c4-grand-picasso/
Share on other sites

I have a friend who has a 2 year old one but even he admits that it is underpowered. He has the 1.6 diesel version. I had a Citroen C3 picasso which had the same engine and that went like a rocket so I presume it's down to the extra weight of the C4.


Apart from that the car is great. Like driving round in a greenhouse, there is so much glass in it. WIth the rear seats down you can get loads of stuff in and on a recent trip to the south of France he got a return of 51mpg overall.


French cars may be a bit boring but they have certainly improved over the last few years and the build quality is great.

We bought one of these 2 years ago. (Mr Izodia is French after all....)


We opted for the 2.0 diesel over the 1.6 and are glad we did. 1.6 seemed like a small engine for a large car which is often full of people and stuff.


It is nice and roomy. It happily takes our family down to mid-south France a couple of times a year with all our gubbins. And yes, with the rear seats down you can fit a lot in (trips to tip, flatpack furniture etc). So it will be our family workhorse for a while yet.


Probably our main niggle is that somehow the petrol tank is a little small for the size of car. In all previous cars we've been able to get all the way to our French destination in one tank. This one needs a pitstop to refill.


Also to look out for, we suffered from a problem with the rear hydraulic suspension, although Citroen did pay 80% of the cost to repair.

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/citroen/c4-picasso/87704/citroen-tackles-c4-picasso-suspension-issues


That all said, we're pretty happy. It's a comfortable family car at a reasonable price.

If you're buying new then drivethedeal has some good discounts.

https://www.drivethedeal.com/buy-a-new-car/CITROEN/GRAND%20C4%20PICASSO%20ESTATE/index.html


However there are some nicer cars in your budget. Get a price then click Other Cars in my Budget - you could get a VW Touran 2.0 diesel estate for less money.


Johnie

I know!!


My last 3 cars have been French, all bought new, all been excellent. I'm currently driving a Peugeot 2008 1,6 diesel and it's superb. Smooth, comfortable, amazingly fast when it needs to be with incredible acceleration and full of toys. Would recommend it highly.


I had a Ford S-max as a loan car a couple of years ago, drank diesel like it nothing else. Over the 6 weeks I had it it cost me an extra ?200 in fuel compared to the Citroen I had at the time.

That would be nice, but unfortunately not until those six numbers come up! Once again, thanks for the feedback everyone - very useful. Will need to book in some test drives. Another question for you all - previous test drives have always been far too short to form much of an impression - any suggestions for how you can negotiate a bit more time (if only an hour or so!). Thanks

Just tell 'em that you want a long test drive. You're the customer, you're going to be spending a lot of money. It they don't like it, go somewhere else. And try and get a salesman who is a bit older. These young whippersnappers are all push push push.




morlewil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That would be nice, but unfortunately not until

> those six numbers come up! Once again, thanks for

> the feedback everyone - very useful. Will need to

> book in some test drives. Another question for you

> all - previous test drives have always been far

> too short to form much of an impression - any

> suggestions for how you can negotiate a bit more

> time (if only an hour or so!). Thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...