Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Even better than looking up GI diet books is GL diet books. The difference between GI (Glycaemic Index) and GL (Glycaemic Load) is that GL takes into account the portion size, because some foods that are listed as having High GI (and by extension are deemed bad for you) are actually ok when you take into account the average portion size, which can help make this kind of eating plan feel a lot less restrictive.


I heartily recommend the GL Diet by Nigel Denby. I've bought at least three copies in the last four months, only one of which was for use by my partner and myself. I've been doing a medically monitored special diet but intend to eat following the GL guidelines when I get to my goal weight, and my other half has lost a stone and a half doing it (while living in a hotel during the week and eating in restaurants every weeknight) over the last five months, and even better, he doesn't feel like he's been on a diet.


GL Diet on Amazon: http://www.amazon.co.uk/GL-Diet-Nigel-Denby/dp/1844541126/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1235396807&sr=8-5

Oooh, I would hate to give too much advice on the food side of things as I'm not a nutritionalist, but apparently bananas are to be avoided, though I think wholemeal bread, brown bread etc is fine (in moderation). Avoid starchy stuff like white rice, white bread, potatoes etc, logical stuff x

There is a piece on World at One right now about type 2 diabetes. Apparantly the cases of it have doubled over the last ten years. 1 in 20 of the population is now diabetic.


There was a woman talking who has done a study into the treatments etc and she was saying that in the early stages it is definitely possible to, as she put it, "directly effect the history of your future illness". In other words dietary changes and exercise will help.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...