Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Even better than looking up GI diet books is GL diet books. The difference between GI (Glycaemic Index) and GL (Glycaemic Load) is that GL takes into account the portion size, because some foods that are listed as having High GI (and by extension are deemed bad for you) are actually ok when you take into account the average portion size, which can help make this kind of eating plan feel a lot less restrictive.


I heartily recommend the GL Diet by Nigel Denby. I've bought at least three copies in the last four months, only one of which was for use by my partner and myself. I've been doing a medically monitored special diet but intend to eat following the GL guidelines when I get to my goal weight, and my other half has lost a stone and a half doing it (while living in a hotel during the week and eating in restaurants every weeknight) over the last five months, and even better, he doesn't feel like he's been on a diet.


GL Diet on Amazon: http://www.amazon.co.uk/GL-Diet-Nigel-Denby/dp/1844541126/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1235396807&sr=8-5

Oooh, I would hate to give too much advice on the food side of things as I'm not a nutritionalist, but apparently bananas are to be avoided, though I think wholemeal bread, brown bread etc is fine (in moderation). Avoid starchy stuff like white rice, white bread, potatoes etc, logical stuff x

There is a piece on World at One right now about type 2 diabetes. Apparantly the cases of it have doubled over the last ten years. 1 in 20 of the population is now diabetic.


There was a woman talking who has done a study into the treatments etc and she was saying that in the early stages it is definitely possible to, as she put it, "directly effect the history of your future illness". In other words dietary changes and exercise will help.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Marveling at the chutzpah of Brexit supporters wanging on about a 4.99% increase in council tax which equates to circa £94/year for the average Band D, whereas it's conservatively estimated* that Brexit has cost each UK household circa £1k/year.  At least with council tax there are actual tangible benefits e.g. weekly waste clearance.  *Based on BoE report 2023...
    • so to summarise, "Party X is stating that Council Y is financially inefficient and saving can be realised or efficiencies made, but when the exercise has been completed, it was found that no savings were achievable". I don't know if you are trying to say that has happened or that if it does happen, that is what would happen.     
    • I would respectfully and strongly disagree.  they are targeting Southwark in exactly the same way they target other councils and will have exactly the same outcome  you would have to say why Southwark is the outlier here and not reform for it to be a meaningful differentiation 
    • Welcome to the year of the Fire Horse
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...