Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So my sons grandparents just logged onto NurseryCam to see what he was up to at Nursery and witness him behaving naughtily I must admit. It was snack time and finished before the other children so got up and went to the painting area, he was left there for 5 min ish and a member of staff came to get him, he then ran off with 2 paints in hands, they caught him and made him put them back. He was then led to the table to sit back down but threw himself on the floor, a member of staff then dragged him by both feet for about 3 metres, he was on his belly.


To be honest I don't really know what to do/ think. Advice please

It depends how it was done, the surface etc, etc. At face value, it doesn't sound good, but needs to be viewed in context. I would get as much info as possible from the grandparents and then, if you're still concerned, speak with the nursery.


Must admit, I'm surprised to learn of the existence of 'NurseryCam'.

I spoke the nursery just now, its funny this has happened on a day that both Manager and Deputy Manager are on holiday. I rang his key worker and explained what grandparents saw, as there is no audio I don't want to go around accusing anyone until confirmed when playing back the CCTV.


Either way as it was explained to me in great detail by my mother already it sounds as though she was trying to make him move to the table. Regardless I feel that forceful means whether its hurting the child or not shouldn't be used in a Nursery setting. I wouldn't drag him at home to make him do something so Im verging towards unacceptable.


I could understand if she was playing with him but this probably (and I say probably as I didn't see) wasn't the case here considering what happened in the build up to the incident.


I am really struggling to call this, even if CCTV shows it, whats next?!

My feeling would be that in a "play" situation it's ok (my kids think it's hilarious to be pulled around by their feet), but most definitely not acceptable if trying to move your son somewhere he does to want to be. In that situation, he should have been picked up, not dragged.


I hope you get some answers.

I tend to agree with the other posters. For play, dragging would be fine. Even though I suspect he wasn?t harmed in anyway and there was no intention to harm, I?ve always felt that manhandling children when they are not doing what you want kind of sends the message it is okay to be physical with people when you are unhappy with what they are doing. The issue is really subtle for me as I don?t think there is any physical danger or threat, just poor behavioral norms.

Yes, I completely agree, dragging/playing with the child is fine, its engaging in a fun way. However it seems to me (by what I have heard and with the build up to the dragging) that this was not a playful action. Its almost as you say sending a message that 'if someone does something I don't like then I can react physically'.


Your right, I don't think there is any danger here but its not normal conduct for a nursery surely? He just turned 3 in December, I don't think any child should be dealt with in that way, by parent or carer.


When I rang the nursery I explained that I had not see this myself so do not want a big deal made, I would however like the manager to look at the CCTV and determine herself whether or not she wants her staff acting like this.


Luckily he is leaving at the end of Feb to go to another nursery.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It depends how it was done, the surface etc, etc.

> At face value, it doesn't sound good, but needs to

> be viewed in context. I would get as much info as

> possible from the grandparents and then, if you're

> still concerned, speak with the nursery.

>

> Must admit, I'm surprised to learn of the

> existence of 'NurseryCam'.



Agree with all this. Especially the bit about NurseryCam. Who knew.

Yes nursery cam does exist! I can view him via website on Web Cam, some nurseries do this but not many.


Anyway I spoke with the nursery and the manager will be informed tomorrow so they can take a look at what happened, will also be good for me to do so as well!


Interesting point made by another mum.. If I had gone in the nursery and dragged him in a none playful way then they would have been the first to inform social services!

If this was my son I would be fuming and he would be taken out. My toddler goes to pre school he is 2 and if they dragged him by his feet play or not I wouldn't be happy. I don't believe any nursery would do that in play, it's one thing to do at home to your own child but you don't expect a teacher to do that in play. What you describe wasn't a play situation, they were trying to get him to stop what he was doing and move to the table. They should be able to get him to do this without force! Regardless of the flooring it's unacceptable. I think the nursery cam is a great idea.
Totally unacceptable! Manager must investigate. I work in nurseries and could not imagine a staff member in the environment dragging a child across the floor like that, regardless of floor surface/context. Dragging a child on his/her belly is never necessary or OK, it's literally manhandling!
He is actually leaving on the 26th February anyway for various other reasons so not long now. Managers back today so let's see what she thinks, I don't really want to involve Ofsted as the Manager herself was very good to me. Il try and get to the bottom of this in house. Will update the thread later as to what she said!
It is outrageous and totally unacceptable. The manager may have been good to you but someone was not very good to your son and needs calling to task. I'd be logging on every min possible to see if repeat behaviour to anyone's child. Ignore social pleasantries of creating a fuss and follow it up - easier said than done I know, but all part of parental responsibility.
I seeked advice from my sister who works as a Social worker and she said to let the manager look because if any untoward did go on (I'm 99.9 now that it did) then the manager has an obligation to call Ousted herself and report that member of staff.

I would be livid. The problem is that as you were not there you can never be sure of the context. Of course they can say it was "funny" but how can you be sure.


You would have to trust them and take their word for it and I would have serious trust issues after such an incident.


wishing you the best of luck!

Just to update everyone.


I have now seen the footage! It was as my mother describe down to a tee. He was definitely dragged towards the table. Didn't look good at all. The nursery manager rang me as soon as she heard and said she was physically shaking at the thought of it. As soon as I got there to pick him up she took me to the office to view, she did say (and I agree) that it wasn't to cause him harm at all and was not done in malice. She also pointed out that the member of staff that done it to him was usually very tolerant however I did point out that Ofsted will not care about temperament of the employees when seeing this!


The fact of the matter is a child was dragged across the room. I have told her I do not want this person to lose their job over this but she said there are procedures that need to be followed and head office would have to be informed. I have asked her not to involve third parties if she believes this can be dealt with 'in house' and trust that the employee will be dealt with accordingly.


Thank god for nursery cam!

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What a load of Bollixing nonsense. I saw Corbyn once speak as a back bencher.  I doubt whether he would have made a credible PM, let alone a leader of a mainstream political party, but he could speak very well. I haven't a clue what the quotes above are about.
    • the 1.8 million unemployed Brits could do the work that Brits won't do. Make minimum wage higher than the maximum benefits payments. So it's more profitable to be in work than it is to be unemployed.   anyway, round 2 today of Labour's attack on immigration. This one is reminiscent of their "hostile environment" that Liam Byrne created in 2007. 
    • He's always been clear he'd rather be elsewhere than Westminster: https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2024/06/18/starmer-davos-interview/ "Westminster is too constrained. It’s closed and we’re not having meaning. Once you get out of Westminster whether it’s Davos or anywhere else, you actually engage with people that you can see working with in the future. Westminster is just a tribal shouting place."   That's who he is.
    • These are the times he used the word "fight", in context. And Rudy [Giuliani], you did a great job. He’s got guts. You know what? He’s got guts, unlike a lot of people in the Republican Party. He’s got guts. He fights. He fights, and I’ll tell you.   ... For years, Democrats have gotten away with election fraud and weak Republicans, and that’s what they are. There’s so many weak Republicans. We have great ones, Jim Jordan, and some of these guys. They’re out there fighting. The House guys are fighting, but it’s incredible. ... Did you see the other day where Joe Biden said, “I want to get rid of the America First policy”? What’s that all about, get rid of -- how do you say, “I want to get rid of America First”? Even if you’re going to do it, don’t talk about it, right? Unbelievable, what we have to go through, what we have to go through, and you have to get your people to fight. And if they don’t fight, we have to primary the hell out of the ones that don’t fight. You primary them. We’re going to let you know who they are. I can already tell you, frankly. ... Republicans are constantly fighting like a boxer with his hands tied behind his back. It’s like a boxer, and we want to be so nice. We want to be so respectful of everybody, including bad people. And we’re going to have to fight much harder, and Mike Pence is going to have to come through for us. ... And we were going to sit home and watch a big victory. And everybody had us down for a victory. It was going to be great. And now we’re out here fighting. ... [ I GUESS THE BBC REALLY COULDN'T USE THIS ONE:] The American people do not believe the corrupt fake news anymore. They have ruined their reputation. But it used to be that they’d argue with me, I’d fight. So I’d fight, they’d fight. I’d fight, they’d fight. Boop-boop. You’d believe me, you’d believe them. Somebody comes out. You know. They had their point of view, I had my point of view. But you’d have an argument. Now what they do is they go silent. It’s called suppression. And that’s what happens in a communist country. That’s what they do. They suppress. You don’t fight with them anymore, unless it’s a bad story. ... With your help over the last four years, we built the greatest political movement in the history of our country and nobody even challenges that. I say that over and over, and I never get challenged by the fake news, and they challenge almost everything we say. But our fight against the big donors, big media, big tech and others is just getting started. ... Our brightest days are before us. Our greatest achievements still wait. I think one of our great achievements will be election security because nobody until I came along, had any idea how corrupt our elections were. And again, most people would stand there at 9:00 in the evening and say, “I want to thank you very much,” and they go off to some other life, but I said, “Something’s wrong here. Something’s really wrong. Can’t have happened.” And we fight. We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...