Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Show off ;-P


I have to say from the screenshots and trailers it seems to have got the look, but then we know Snyder can do visuals.

If anything a little too polished? It is supposed to be a rotten and gritty world.


but as Brendan says, definite trepidation, but not a little excitement.

Booked in to see it at the Imax, so have to wait a week.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5536-watchmen/#findComment-177956
Share on other sites

I remember when Dune was made into a film, it was apparently 8 and a half hours long, almost 6 hours of which ended up on the cutting room floor, and it basically made absolutely no sense at all (and eventually got made (completely anew, not with that material) into a mini-series (of dubious quality, with a really fit Princess Irulan as I recall)) and Frank Herbert expressed some wish that there might be a way to release it as a long film/mini series.


This was about 15 years before DVDs existed, so no reason why there wouldn't be a full length Watchmen if that much was cut, the LoTR people did it.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5536-watchmen/#findComment-178085
Share on other sites

It is a bit rubbish. Risible on so many levels. And yet..


I heard/read someone else talking about it somewhere who summed-up exactly what I thought about it: they said that despite all its very obvious failings, whenever they thought about the book they couldn't help thinking about the film - in a sort-of companion piece way. I think there's something in that somewhere.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5536-watchmen/#findComment-178098
Share on other sites

Brendan wrote:-LotR always gives me hope that it is possible to make a film/s that do a book justice.



I have seen only one film that could replace the book "A day in the life of Ivan Denisovitch" that movie would have saved you reading the book.


Dune the book I loved and was gripped by, but the movie I yawned.


I loved lord of the rings book too, but have deliberately avoided the film.


They have made some wonderful films of the Dickens classics, but none can replace the reading of the book in my opinion.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5536-watchmen/#findComment-178267
Share on other sites

Nearly got excited about the film till I saw the running time. It took me a year to read the book (nothing compared to the wait for From Hell or even Big Numbers) but I begrudge Zac Snyder two and a half hours, I turned off 300 after 45 minutes! The man is really the most anodyne of directors, unable to drive any ideas of his own he takes wholesale from the comic book world, too shallow to realize the comic book is to celluloid as poetry is to the pop video.


On a similair note, what the hell happened to Burlyman Comics? Doc Frankenstien and Shaolin Cowboy were excellant and I could really do with a shot of Geoff Darrow right now.


The only comic book adaptation that worked was A History of Violence. Can anyone think of any others? Cartoons don't count.


http://www.apple.com/trailers/universal/publicenemies/ looks good.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5536-watchmen/#findComment-178312
Share on other sites

Really? I think 2 and a half hours is too short.


Surely considering the hard hitting social messages in watchmen someone like Snyder who will ?translate it verbatim? is what they were looking for. Or is that me being naive in assuming that Joe Public is going to have the wherewithal to think about what the writer is trying to say about the world they inhabit?


As for recent adaptations, I liked Road to Perdition and Sin City. I can?t say From Hell did the book justice. Actually all of the attempts to film Alan Moore?s work so far have been a bit rubbish. Not necessarily rubbish films, just rubbish compared to the books.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5536-watchmen/#findComment-178360
Share on other sites

Yeah, forgot about Sin City, what a great film that was, the flip side of course being The Spirit. And I suppose it could be a geek thing, I prefer to think of it as 'media' thing, or opinion on the artistic media of the 20/21st century. We now have film, T.V., comic books, music, gaming and mobile communications that in the scheme of things are incredibly new and young media compared to the traditional.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5536-watchmen/#findComment-178398
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
    • Point is.. top two have quit.. BBC is now what? From being well respected world wide.. not only for news, programs, no idea about pod casts.. Only thing we as a country do well currently is broadcast remembrance service…. Lets face it.. only country that I know of who can release wrong people from jail.. one gave himself up if news is to believed and the other is where? Only country I know of who actually pay people to leave, flights etc and they are back in country .. all heard via Radio 4…  
    • It doesn't matter what channel it was on, how pernicious the subject is and when it happened. Mis-representing the truth in broadcast is not only morally wrong, it's against the OFCOM code of ethics.  Everyone in the industry is trained in how not to do it, most are made to take the BBC's own 'Safeguarding the Trust' course, even if they aren't making BBC programmes.  There wasn't much fuss at the time, because no one knew about it.  "Unless you hate Britain, hate liberals, hate the BBC, want a divided country, support the most powerful person in the world despite his many failings". What the programme makers personally think or feel should never affect how they tell a story; to do so is deeply unprofessional and a sackable offence.  It's the job of the BBC and of all programming to inform viewers of the facts and let them make up their own minds. Even in campaigning documentaries.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...