MUDDY BOOTS Children's Nature Group - Monday & Friday FOREST HILL

By kelda
March 12, 2015 in What's on in East Dulwich

Followers 0

Recommended Posts

kelda

Posted March 12, 2015

- Share

Posted March 12, 2015

MUDDY BOOTS Children's Group Mondays and Fridays (term-time)

10-11.30am at Devonshire Road Nature Reserve

ADDITIONAL Friday 13th - AFTERNOON TRIAL session 2.30-4pm (to see if popular enough to run regularly) Please let me know below if you are definitely coming to this afternoon session : )

We'll be thinking about a certain prickly creature that is coming out of hibernation. And we'll be making some of them out of clay.

Drop in, ?6/ child, sibling discount.

Sessions include listening, making, learning about nature ,exploring, getting grubby, sitting with your friends at basecamp, a snack, a story and singing songs in the meadow.

See you there!

aDDITIONAL INFO Muddy Boots is a children's nature group which runs at Devonshire Road Nature Reserve in Forest Hill every Monday and Friday 10-11.30. Its very hands-on, friendly, relaxed, completely outdoors and aims to let children learn about nature, get grubby, get lots of fresh air and explore this lovely wild green space at their own pace. Each week we have a nature related activity nature and there's digging, watering, a walk in the woods and listening for wildlife. We end up back at our log circle basecamp with a story, snack and songs. Children any age love the peace of the reserve and are very welcome. To engage best with the day's more structured activity, I recommend 14m and over. Younger siblings are very welcome to come along for free. ?6 per child, sibling discount. Meet at the gates on Devonshire Road, opposite Tyson road.

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Followers 0

Go to topic listing

Advertise Here
Latest Discussions
- Latest One Dulwich update
  
  By Earl Aelfheah · Posted 6 minutes ago
  
  57% of those who actually lived in the consultation area I believe. Around 3,000. Presumably 2,000 of whom are the ‘supporters of One Dulwich (but not members of One Dulwich? So how does one ‘join’?) So tell us about it. it seems fairly clear that Southwark could have done more first time round as they did open the junction back up to emergency services. I’m not sure why this suggests someone shawdowy is ‘pulling their strings’ though as you suggest. You say read up on it - why not share the evidence that emergency services were knocking on the council’s door for months and months? You’ve just posted a claim the the LFB haven’t been consulted this time round, yet their spokesman says “Regarding the FOI, the local authority did consult the Brigade. However, they didn’t initially contact the specific Southwark team, who responded on the FOI saying they hadn’t been contacted.” I have answered all your questions that are actual question. You ducked and deflected my two simple questions for several pages, before awkwardly distancing yourself from the claims made in the missive you shared 😳 A question that says “do you agree with a design that does nothing to stop persistent number plate covering offenders” is what’s called a loaded question. Whether one say yes or no it accepts the premise. It’s the classic ‘when did you stop beating your wife” construction, and it’s not very subtle.
- Here it is - thanks to all on the forum who helped us create a history of ed's home, 41 North Cross Rd
  
  By Earl Aelfheah · Posted 8 hours ago
  
  This is great 👏
- One (part of) Dulwich
  
  By OutOfFocus · Posted 8 hours ago
  
  Can someone please explain who "one Dulwich" are?
- Latest One Dulwich update
  
  By Rockets · Posted 8 hours ago
  
  We are actually referred to as "Supporters"...2,100 of us across Dulwich...read and weep! 😉 https://www.onedulwich.uk/supporters Got it, the one where 64% of respondents in the consultation area said they wanted the measures "returned to their original state". Is that the one you claim had a yes/no response question? Well I suggest you read up on it as it is an important part of the story of utter mismangement by the councils and this is why so many of us can't work out who is pulling the council's strings on this one because surely you can agree that if the emergency services were knocking on your door for months and months telling you the blocks in the roads were delayihg response times and putting lives at risk you'd do something about it? Pretty negligent not to do so don't you think - if I was a councillor it would not sit well with me? Careful it could be a Mrs, Miss or Mx One..... Of course you don't that's because you have strong opinions but hate being asked for detail to.back-up those opinions (especially when it doesn't serve their narrative) and exposes the flaws in your arguments! 😉 As so many of the pro-LTN lobby find to their cost the devil is always in the detail.....

Sign In