Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1) The squalid sea of bags and strewn clothing around the large Scope bin in the carpark has become a permanent disgrace. I wish I had posted photo's last week. After a tidy-up in the last few days (which did not, however, include actually EMPTYING the thing) this spot is an eyesore once again. Certainly, Scope bosses should get off their incompetent, overpaid behinds and deal with it. But the final responsibility is Southwark's. If Scope can't or won't keep their bin tidy, it should be replaced by that of a more efficient charity.


2) Workers are now landscaping the 'bypass to and from nowhere', where the additional depot enclosure used to be. It's a tricky spot, usually shady for one thing. But a bypass path? Which wannabe motorway planner came up with that? And the planting looks as contemporary and interesting as, ooo! . . . Margate 1955.


Peckham Rye and the Park are a magnificent space IN SPITE of the 'defensive [ie minimal] maintenance' strategy and utter-utter-utter lack of effort or imagination put into them. But as East Dulwich and SE London generally become ever more vibrant, creative and diverse, Southwark's lacklustre, asleep-at-the-wheel, same-old-contracts dead hand upon this green public space becomes ever more dispiriting. Look at the parks and spaces of other cities around the world. See what parks can really be, in the 21st century!


3) I suppose suggesting a speed bump to slow downhill cyclists on the newly paved path was the kiss of death. The faceless-nameless ones and their contractor chums don't want to appear to be 'responding to pressure'. What's that? Democracy? Designing-in safety? As Tony S says: Fuhgedabowddit! So Blah Blah (of this parish) will be happy to see reasserted his idea of English commonsense governance: that is, some toddler or elderly walker will have to be sent flying, and badly injured. Then - only then - will the faceless-nameless ones declare their boundless humanity on our behalf and belatedly install a bump or calming barrier.


That this tendency is already expressing itself, I witnessed just a few minutes ago: A downhill cyclist, without slowing his considerable speed, swung into the gate adjacent to the outdoor exercise area. Elegant to watch - disastrous for anyone just coming up the inside path to that gate.


Lee Scoresby

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Please rescue. There are plenty of kittens waiting in shelters for a loving home. Try reaching out to https://straycatclub.org.uk/ You can also find an endless list of shelters down below: https://www.catchat.org/index.php/cat-rescue-centres-uk-ireland You should be vetted to ensure you can provide a suitable environment. Unlike breeders, shelters ensure kittens have been spayed/neutered, microchipped & recieve their vaccination.  
    • hellosailor, I feel you on this one. People continue to breathe life into the misconceptions that cats are low-maintenance, natural wanderers or that they can't be prevented from accessing a road - all of which no doubt contributes to these harsh measures. Shelters would do better using their position & platforms to educate rather than applying blanket rules that alienate potential adopters. It does sound like there are inconsistencies in the way Celia Hammond operates. I know of people who have adopted despite not providing a truly suitable environment for their cats. Personally, I was heartbroken to learn that two of the kittens that I had fostered, after being adopted, would later go "missing" on a regular basis. It's a stark reminder that while safety precautions are crucial, overly rigid policies may push well-meaning people toward buying instead of adopting, undermining the very mission of rescue organisations. TWB has taken the initiative to lead by example, teaching clients the importance of mental & physical enrichment, & having policies in place to prevent, for example, the dangers that come with giving cats access to the streets. It has become far too commonplace to see posts regarding cats who have been run over, only for the owners to adopt & repeat the cycle all over again. If shelters could provide insight on why these measures are in place & solutions, these shelters would not only free space within their shelters but educate the public & the overall standards of responsible pet ownership in London. Celia Hammond is a charity most are familiar with, but there are so many others listed within this link; https://www.catchat.org/index.php/cat-rescue-centres-uk-ireland An up & coming charity that is not found in this link, that deserves an honorable mention is https://straycatclub.org.uk/  
    • Looking for a new member of the family.  Will be looking into cat resuce centre's as well before anyone mentions. But my son is in adoration with Kittens and would like to bring one up from a young age. If anyone has any leads, they would be most welcome. 
    • I'm not suggesting that the staff are not good people, it's a fantastic charity to work or volunteer for and what they champion and advocate for is super important. It's great that you had a successful adoption through them and really good to hear that you had a positive experience but I was relaying that anecdotally the many people I know who have tried to rescue a cat from them have been turned down. I myself tried to adopt from them a few years ago and they nixed my application when I said I lived on a road which cars go down. They didn't even do a home visit, that was enough to rule us out. Hopefully things have changed since then to allow more animals to find a loving home. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...