Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have read in several papers over the last months about a new Govenment data base of children's details (I think this is came out of the Victoria Clumbie enquiry) called Contact point. Can we trust this Government with data? especially children's.... What are they going to keep on it? How is the information going to be collected? Who will have access?

I'm sure some of you out there have an opinion.............................

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5640-contact-point-what-is-it/
Share on other sites

SOMETHING TO PONDER OVER


Common knowledge?


Can you imagine working for a company that has a little more than 600 employees and has the following employee statistics:


29 have been accused of spouse abuse


7 have been arrested for fraud


9 have been accused of writing bad cheques


17 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses


3 have done time for assault


71 cannot get a credit card


14 have been arrested on drug-related charges


8 have been arrested for shop-lifting


21 are currently defendants in lawsuits


84 have been arrested for drink driving in the last year


Which organisation is this?


It's the 635 members of the House of Commons, the same group that cranks out hundreds of new laws each year designed to keep the rest of us inline.


What a bunch of to**er's we have running our country - it says it all. And just to top all that they probably have the best 'corporate' pension scheme in the country .


If you agree that this is an appalling state of affairs, please pass it on to everyone you know. It's time to stand up to this lot.


Some thing that dropped in to my email box the other day.

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Some thing that dropped in to my email box the

> other day.


do you believe everything that drops into your inbox? the stats don't given get the number of members right, so i wouldn't put too much faith in these 'facts'

Freddy1929 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have read in several papers over the last months

> about a new Govenment data base of children's

> details (I think this is came out of the Victoria

> Clumbie enquiry) called Contact point. Can we

> trust this Government with data? especially

> children's.... What are they going to keep on it?

> How is the information going to be collected? Who

> will have access?

> I'm sure some of you out there have an

> opinion.............................


It's a matter of fact, not opinion.


From the ARCH website:


The Children Act 2004 empowered the Secretary of State for Education to create a database (or databases) of everyone in England who is aged under 18. In July 2007, the regulations that will bring this first national database of children into being were passed by Parliament.


The government has announced that the database will be called ContactPoint. It was originally known as the Information-Sharing Index, but re-branded in February 2007 because of negative publicity about information sharing.


ContactPoint is effectively a file-front that serves the whole range of agencies that may be involved with a child. It is intended to provide a complete directory of all children from birth, together with a list of the agencies with which s/he is in contact. It won?t hold any case records, but will enable practitioners to indicate their involvement with a family and contact each other in order to share information. It will also show whether an eCAF (an in-depth personal profile under the Common Assessment Framework) has been carried out and is available for sharing.


The regulations can be seen on the Office of Public Sector Information website {hyperlink: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2007/20072182.htm ]


Schedule 1 specifies the data that will be collected on each child


Schedule 2 lists the children?s charities that can grant access


Schedule 3 lists the categories of people who are allowed access


All children will be included in the database, but the records of some children will be ?shielded? if it is thought necessary.


Information that a ?sensitive? service ? sexual health, substance misuse and mental health ? is being provided will only be included on ContactPoint with consent.


The government estimates that ContactPoint will cost ?224m to establish and ?41m per year to run. The contract has been awarded to CapGemini, and it is expected that ContactPoint will be operational at some point from early 2009.


http://www.arch-ed.org/issues/databases/contactpoint.htm


(Note that 'shielded' children will be those of politicans, the rich and famous.)


See also 3 videoas on YouTube:


etc.


If you are concerned about this issue, or the wider 'data on children' issues

http://www.arch-ed.org/issues/databases/childrens_databases.htm

please consider supporting the work of Action on Rights for Children.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...