Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Pickle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm pretty sure the French Cafe is staying where

> it is, and the owner is opening a separate venture

> on the new site (I spoke to her a month or so ago

> and that's the impression I got).



Things have changed since then Pickle. The French Caf? is moving to the new premises.

simonethebeaver Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fox, next time you get annoyed by someone calling

> you negative, have a look at your last post. Wait

> and see, eh?


What are you talking about... ????

I have written only positive posts about the French Caf?..

That I like the place and I am disappointed its changing.


It's MY preference...


.. and don't call me Fox.


DF

I am DulwichFox or Foxy (Depends on subject matter)


Fox is fine when used affectionately / or when expressing agreement... IE. 'Yer that's right Fox'


but not when used derisively..


It's like how you should address anyone on the forum. With respect. Even if you don't agree with their view.


DulwichFox

I can assure you it was only intended as a shortening of your name with no disrespect whatsoever. I find your tone a bit aggressive - I am not someone who has ever been rude to you and my initial post was intended to be jokily helpful as I have seen you post before that you don't see why people call you negative. I have always thought rather highly of you as you once did me a great favour that meant a lot. I will do my best to avoid offending you in future but I never meant to do it in the first place.

simonethebeaver Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can assure you it was only intended as a

> shortening of your name with no disrespect

> whatsoever. I find your tone a bit aggressive - I

> am not someone who has ever been rude to you and

> my initial post was intended to be jokily helpful

> as I have seen you post before that you don't see

> why people call you negative. I have always

> thought rather highly of you as you once did me a

> great favour that meant a lot. I will do my best

> to avoid offending you in future but I never meant

> to do it in the first place.


That's fair enough .. Thank you.


Cannot remember specifically what that favour was. :)


A lot of my 'work' here on EDF is in the way of PM's offering help and assistance to other users.

So unseen to everyone else here.


aggressive... ???


There was a time when I wouldn't say BOO to a Goose. I just stick up for myself now.

This may shock some people who knew be back then.


Anyway I'm off to the French Caf? for one of those spirally things with currants in and a pot of tea.


ETA :- I remember now . I repaired your Radio.


Foxy

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why would you have to look for "a good reason to not vote for the greens"? What a very strange thing to say. Would you like to explain your logic?
    • Hi All, Looking for recommendations in the following professions. Ideally based locally. -Psychiatrist -Psychologist  -Therapist (EMDR) -Child Psychiatrist ADHD and ASD exp - ideal Any information would be appriciated. C
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...