Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There are, all over the country, small deep 'bunkers' which were actually the working locations of the Royal Observer Corps (since disbanded) post-war. These bunkers had room enough for 3-4 people and were to be manned (for real, rather than for training) in the event of (a) nuclear war or (b) a civil nuclear incident. They were equipped with simple photographic plates (forms of pin-hole cameras) which would be able to capture the size (by scale of the image), height and direction of a bomb exploding. Observers would then, using land-lines, report these to a Regional Central HQ (I was stationed in one of these) where the bomb would be triangulated (from 3 or more reports) with its position and size known (and whether a ground or air-burst). Additional equipment in the bunkers were radiation counters so that radioactive clouds could be plotted - this last role would also have operated in case of a civilian emergency.


Goodness knows whether any of this would ever actually have worked as planned - thank goodness it was never called-on to do so - though the ROC was put into stand-to mode on a number of occasions during the cold war.


The bunker in the golf course is most likely to have been an ROC observation bunker, I would think, rather than a bolt-hole for government people.


Edited to say - I have just spotted the post above this which confirms that this was an ROC post.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • wanted lego my child is collecting lego if you have any for sale please let me know
    • I'd actually go the whole hog and do a fondue, we all remember them fondly from parties in the last century or trips to Switzerland.  As long as it is cheese, not chocolate, urghhh
    • Gosh, that all sounds so familiar!  Southwark are constantly holding up their Outdoor Events Policy as proof of process, but then constantly allow exceptions when things aren't quite done correctly. Point in case, Gala's licence application - extract from the Consultation Findings Report - "The GALA team formally submitted their application to hold GALA 2025 to the council on the 7 October 2024. It is usually a requirement that applications for larger scale events are submitted with a minimum of 9 months to process them, but discretion can be applied if there are mitigating circumstances. 8.4 of the Outdoor Events Policy clarifies that processing applications received outside the stated lead-in times is at the Council's discretion. In this case: • The council were aware that Assembled Gala were preparing an application for the event to take place in 2025 in advance of their submission date, with operational discussions already taking place • GALA festival has been taking place in Peckham Rye Park since 2018 – less time is needed regarding event planning than if it were a new event • The GALA team already have a Premises Licence in place for this event (this is a pre- requisite for the Event Licence to be issued), so no time needed to be factored in for a premises licence application and decision-making process" So despite the fact that there would need to be major planning decisions due to the change of site access, they didn't think Gala needed to adhere to the same rules as everyone else? Makes me wonder what other rules they are exempted from... On a similar note, has anyone received a Resident Communication letter, containing the contact details for issues? We haven't, and we live directly opposite the site on Colyton Rd. They were supposedly distributed on 29/4...
    • We find that just adding your own favourites is the best way - everyone likes different things and your guests will likely be happy enough
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...