Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There are, all over the country, small deep 'bunkers' which were actually the working locations of the Royal Observer Corps (since disbanded) post-war. These bunkers had room enough for 3-4 people and were to be manned (for real, rather than for training) in the event of (a) nuclear war or (b) a civil nuclear incident. They were equipped with simple photographic plates (forms of pin-hole cameras) which would be able to capture the size (by scale of the image), height and direction of a bomb exploding. Observers would then, using land-lines, report these to a Regional Central HQ (I was stationed in one of these) where the bomb would be triangulated (from 3 or more reports) with its position and size known (and whether a ground or air-burst). Additional equipment in the bunkers were radiation counters so that radioactive clouds could be plotted - this last role would also have operated in case of a civilian emergency.


Goodness knows whether any of this would ever actually have worked as planned - thank goodness it was never called-on to do so - though the ROC was put into stand-to mode on a number of occasions during the cold war.


The bunker in the golf course is most likely to have been an ROC observation bunker, I would think, rather than a bolt-hole for government people.


Edited to say - I have just spotted the post above this which confirms that this was an ROC post.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...