Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Rail Ale was the weaker, Firkin was the middle, and Dogbolter was the strongest.

Each of the Firkin pubs changed the name of the weaker pint to reflect the pub I think.

And yes, I loved all three, but Dogbolter was the Dog'sBollox.


I do rather like Youngs Double Chocolate Stout.

And most Porters.

And I have only found one pub in London that does Mackeson.

A riverside pub called The Hope and Anchor in SE7.

Does anyone know of any other pub that does Mackeson?

fullers have just realeased "george gales & sons " Seafarers ale"


only 3.6% so i think its more of a session ale rather than a premium


if anyone sees or samples it , please feel free to let us know your thoughts


cheer to the beers , all hail to the ale!!


phil

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apart from John Smiths I think that Carlsberg is

> just pointless. 3.7% isn't enough. I remember

> drinking 15 tin of this 'beer' and it didn't even

> get me pissed (well perhaps a bit) and the next

> morning my farts were soooo powerful I could feel

> them blowing against my ankles.



Just re-read this post and laughed out loud, my head like a nodding dog, very, very, funny.


Ale is for the refined palette,It takes time effort and research. A good ale "mentor" helps you appreciate it's subtleties.Go to any small town or country village and order a pint of their local ale & it won't be long before a regular strikes up a conversation with you, some how you slip through the net of suspicion easier.

I'm sure most are put of first time by quick a sip of warm muddy John Smith or a pint of cloudy Bass. I myself started out on "Badgers Tanglefoot" served crystal clear at the perfect temprature in a Sussex pub ( The Vine at Tarring) on a busy sunday lunch, free roast potatoes dusted with chili flakes served at the bar..............


ohh but they were the days....


W**F



( mining banality at the coal face of sh*te )

BigPhil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> magners is great on a hot day, esp with loads of

> ice ( hey , im a kiwi, love freezing cold beer)

>

> We charge ?3.50 for the big bottle which I think

> is a pretty good price


Wow, thats pretty darn cheap....

Btw, I do have a soft spot for kiwi white wine...Oyster bay rules...

Will add that one to the "must try list"


However don't put me on the "list makers" ...erm "list"


I am right off being on "the list" list


So please will you strike me off your list , if i'm on there, if not add it to your "to do" list for later


I'm sure you understand



W**F




( put's own list ...Owccchh...back where it oooooow came from)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Mad that on a thread about the telegraph (and are we saying they  are a paragon of reporting? Are we?) it just happens to be the bbc and only the bbc copping the flak headnun - I’m not sure your point about despicable people “hanging themselves” holds up in a world where despicable people appear to be taking over in so many places  for too long, these people have been given equal airtime to normal people, creating a false equivalence - the result being a lot of people seem to think “well if one person thinks smoking is bad for you and one person thinks it’s good for you, who am I to say who is right and wrong”      
    • you're witnessing "Natural Selection" the core mechanism behind the theory of evolution which determines if organisms will survive long enough to produce offspring
    • Maybe Angelina did see them, however how many people and drivers didn't?  Just takes one to cause life changing for both.  Wouldn't it be more sensible if cyclists realised lights and reflective gear is not just to help them see but to potentially save their lives by making them visible to all. 
    • I agree with this, I'm afraid.  I see it every day within the industry - a lot of it is to do with the fact that the people working in it are younger now and don't realise how much they're being subconsciously indoctrinated by certain forces (social media and group-think), so they're now pathologically incapable of objectivity. Also, they don't read books, pick up the phone to experts, or generally know how to research properly.  On a lot of documentaries I've worked on, I've been leant on hard to peddle narratives that are not only heavily biased, but often outright inaccurate, and I've fought back where I can. It's really depressing,  I'd like to think that, at the BBC, I'd be immune from these influences, and allowed to project a 360 view, but it's sadly  not the case. You'd also be surprised at how toothless the BBC can be when presented with something that's irrefutable but could, say, upset Murdoch or the DM...  Hands up, I'm guilty of platforming extreme right-wingers, misogynists, anti-abortionists, racists, anarchists, pro gun lobbyists, rape-apologists... you name it, I'm all for putting them in a programme. Even though I deplore what they stand for, it's important to me to have a counter-view, and they almost always hang themselves.  (Job done.)  It's funny that certain people are up in arms about Rockets posting 'misinformation' in the Traffic threads, but  seem OK with it in broadcast, as long as it aligns with their views. You have to ask yourselves, what is it that you really want? If it's an echo chamber then just watch Fox News or CNN, however you lean. But then what's the point of it all? I fear the ship's sailed, so I don't know why I bother. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...