Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The protests are in the City too...the irony is

> when I was a student and it was "Stop the city"

> "We" (the 300 anarchists or so ) were advised to

> wear suits to "blend in and stop you getting

> knicked" good ol' Kevin Bone and Class War


This could be sublime - your average City accountant sneaking in wearing ripped combats and stick-on dreads, only to encounter a perfectly turned out crowd of protesters shooting their double-cuffs at them.

I am deliberating about joining the march, one part of it is leaving from London Bridge Station at 11.30

(but I have to be back at the studio by 4.00 for a meeting... not very rebellious I know!)


Do you think I am asking for trouble? I would like to go for the first few hours and then head back to London Bridge via the back streets...

do you think I will make it back in time?? (and in one piece?)

advice please... oh wise ones....

anyone come with me???


see info below

xxcc


http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/blog/2009/mar/23/online-guide-to-g20-protests



___________


BACK A HORSE


The Four Horsefolk of the Apocalypse will lead the carnival parades. Converge from 11 a.m. to move off at 11.30 from these rail stations:


?Moorgate Red horse: War

?Liverpool St Green horse: Climate chaos

?London Bridge Silver horse: Financial crimes

?Cannon Street Black horse: home, land, equality and self sufficiency in honour of the 360th full circle anniversary to the day of the Diggers and their claim: THE LAND: A COMMON TREASURY FOR ALL!


Each parade will have fitting music and many in costume. Bring flags. Bring tea making facilities (including water and kindling). A map of the city, incase you get lost. And cake. You can't have a revolution without cake.


We have a choir, a jazz outfit, a samba band and a protest muscian's collective. We invite all musicians to come and join in at the bank.

http://www.g-20meltdown.org

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Charlies the catalystic provocateur.

> I'll be wearing my steel toe cap trainers and I'll

> be donning me knuckle duster just in case.


is that so you can come and save me when the going gets tough????


ps do you think I will be able to make it back to the studio for 4.00 (it's in east dulwich)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...