Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jrussel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> By the way, have you ever seen a fitness centre

> where the standard of interior design, in

> aesthetic terms, is anything greater than

> mediocre?


I can happily say that I have never seen the inside of a gym.


Or a Jim for that matter.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jrussel Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > By the way, have you ever seen a fitness centre

> > where the standard of interior design, in

> > aesthetic terms, is anything greater than

> > mediocre?

>

> I can happily say that I have never seen the

> inside of a gym.

>

> Or a Jim for that matter.


You'll note I trust Brendan this bunch of lycra-clad muscle maries have not seen fit to mention Jim Beam.

Jim Jones, founder of the People's Temple.

Jimmy Jones the popular comedian "I get people mixing me up with that Jim Jones that got all them people to kill 'emselves in Guyana in 1978. Now in case you don't know the difference between us, listen carefully, he was a proper cult and I'm a proper c*****nt"

Actually I don't know if the popular comic ever used this in his act, but if he wants to he's welcome.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...