Jump to content

Recommended Posts

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Those drop down menus on websites to select your

> country. That require you to scroll all the way

> down past the Democratic of Congo, Ethiopia etc to

> get to United Kingdom.

>

> Why not have it at the top as a default choice?


xxxxx


Because unless it's a UK website, why should the UK be a default choice?


We're a f-ing tiny island, FFS :))

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

'unnecessary use of red ink' is a great entry to this thread.



anyway, you're queuing for the loos as both are occupied and by god, you've waited bloody AGES then someone pops in just like that and insouciantly joins the queue. Then both occupants of the loos finish at the same time giving the person behind IMMEDIATE access to a loo that you've had to wait ages for.


Oh, and you've chosen the one without any tissue left and a faulty lock on the door.

The express self checkout thing


I'm fine with it, i've developed near ninja skills


But, fuk bones with a purse, mobile and a child to ignore takes ONE hand to scan & put the stuff on the packing shelf. Not in the bags provided, but on the packing shelf, then tries to pay, then calls someone, then answers their phone, then wankily packs the stuff in a bag at sub zero speed


All the while ignoring the child who's been leaning on the shelf fekkin up the scale thing in the first place. Lastly your child doesn't need to wear an oversized puffa coat, or eat a jumbo packet of Haribo's at 10 am, whilst you're still in your pyjamas but wearing massive false eyelashes (unstuck at the corner)


I'm sure it's not exclusively a Sydenham thing

womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh dear netty. I think a small drink and a lie

> down are required.


You'd think so, tho only if the STUPID people over the road DIDN'T let their horrible fat dog bark in the garden at 4 am.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...