Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"The spelling teh...........why?"


I'm a big culprit here - it's a common enough typo apparently. If it's any consolation it drives me nuts too and I catch a LOT of them before I click post. Which is even more shocking


ted - nanny state or no, have you seen people suffering on a hot and crowded train on a hot day, and how many of them need but don't have water? being reminded is no bad thing.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "when asked "how are you" the response "I'm good".

> I'm enquiring after your health not your

> behavioural status"

>

> http://motivatedgrammar.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/t

> he-im-good-outrage-is-nonsense/

> http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar

> /good-versus-well

>

> I'm well at pedantry ;-P


It still grates on me - in future if someone says "I'm good", I shall reply "at what?"

I was asked at a coffee shop what size cappuccino I wanted and I replied "Small". The barista (as opposed to barrister) looked bemused and asked "Do you want a regular one?", to which I replied "In Britain we say 'small' and not 'regular' - at least I do". The Americanisation of the country is going too far.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Funnily enough what grates with me is people

> deigning to tell others what to do whilst only

> exposing their own ignorance, even when given the

> correct information, making them irritatingly

> dogmatic zealouts.


If you mean me, El Pibe, I am entitled to interpret a person's response how I see fit - just because a language evolves doesn't mean I have to like it or, indeed, embrace it. Actually, you saw fit to tell me what to do. Anyhoo (now that one really irritates, although with yey high) - I'm off to enquire about someone's wellbeing - hope you all have a jolly well day.....

no, you're choosing to misinterpret what someone's saying by only allowing for one interpretation of the word good, and then projecting your ignorance onto another.


And don't use evolve, as if you've been caught out by a some new rule. You're simply having a reaction thanks to an incorrect prejudice that you must have learned from someone else; blame them I say!!


I'm not telling you what to do, im presenting you with the facts, choosing not to believe in gravity doesn't stop you falling out a window does it.


Anyhoo, teh my bad for getting wound up methinks.

Dialect prejudice is something I constantly have to force myself to overcome and not be wound up by (it's easy if you try ladynorwood).


Ironically "it's well" meaning "it's good" is a feature of language here, rather than incorrect, but a generous interpretation that maybe there's an implicit end to the sentence, say "your house is looking well [constructed]" could explain it.


Illuminous seems to be the standard word for luminous. Though comparisment seems to be only favoured among my in-laws rather than widespread so usually elicits a rolling of the eyes from me.


Irregardless gets no bye from me though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government 
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...