Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"The spelling teh...........why?"


I'm a big culprit here - it's a common enough typo apparently. If it's any consolation it drives me nuts too and I catch a LOT of them before I click post. Which is even more shocking


ted - nanny state or no, have you seen people suffering on a hot and crowded train on a hot day, and how many of them need but don't have water? being reminded is no bad thing.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "when asked "how are you" the response "I'm good".

> I'm enquiring after your health not your

> behavioural status"

>

> http://motivatedgrammar.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/t

> he-im-good-outrage-is-nonsense/

> http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar

> /good-versus-well

>

> I'm well at pedantry ;-P


It still grates on me - in future if someone says "I'm good", I shall reply "at what?"

I was asked at a coffee shop what size cappuccino I wanted and I replied "Small". The barista (as opposed to barrister) looked bemused and asked "Do you want a regular one?", to which I replied "In Britain we say 'small' and not 'regular' - at least I do". The Americanisation of the country is going too far.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Funnily enough what grates with me is people

> deigning to tell others what to do whilst only

> exposing their own ignorance, even when given the

> correct information, making them irritatingly

> dogmatic zealouts.


If you mean me, El Pibe, I am entitled to interpret a person's response how I see fit - just because a language evolves doesn't mean I have to like it or, indeed, embrace it. Actually, you saw fit to tell me what to do. Anyhoo (now that one really irritates, although with yey high) - I'm off to enquire about someone's wellbeing - hope you all have a jolly well day.....

no, you're choosing to misinterpret what someone's saying by only allowing for one interpretation of the word good, and then projecting your ignorance onto another.


And don't use evolve, as if you've been caught out by a some new rule. You're simply having a reaction thanks to an incorrect prejudice that you must have learned from someone else; blame them I say!!


I'm not telling you what to do, im presenting you with the facts, choosing not to believe in gravity doesn't stop you falling out a window does it.


Anyhoo, teh my bad for getting wound up methinks.

Dialect prejudice is something I constantly have to force myself to overcome and not be wound up by (it's easy if you try ladynorwood).


Ironically "it's well" meaning "it's good" is a feature of language here, rather than incorrect, but a generous interpretation that maybe there's an implicit end to the sentence, say "your house is looking well [constructed]" could explain it.


Illuminous seems to be the standard word for luminous. Though comparisment seems to be only favoured among my in-laws rather than widespread so usually elicits a rolling of the eyes from me.


Irregardless gets no bye from me though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Week 11 fixtures...   Saturday 8th November Tottenham Hotspur v Manchester United Everton v Fulham West Ham United v Burnley Sunderland v Arsenal Chelsea v Wolverhampton Wanderers   Sunday 9th November Aston Villa v AFC Bournemouth Brentford v Newcastle United Crystal Palace v Brighton & Hove Albion Nottingham Forest v Leeds United Manchester City v Liverpool
    • Another recommendation for Dulwich Test and Services Centre. Only been using them for a couple of years but wish I’d found them earlier 
    • A new roadmap (surely railmap?!) for rail accessibility has been published: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/accessible-railways-roadmap It says "approximately 56% of stations and around 66% of the 1.3 billion journeys that take place on the network have step-free access to platforms...  "£373 million has been committed over the next 5 years to deliver Access for All projects, providing step-free access from station entrances to and between platforms, alongside other essential accessibility upgrades. These works, together, will increase the number of step-free stations across Great Britain from 56% to 58%. "This improvement will make travel easier with step-free access available at stations covering an increased share of total rail journeys – from 66% up to 71%" Don't know what that means for us here: upgrading Peckham Rye would cover a lot of rail journeys but the cost has no doubt increased from the £40m figure previously quoted. So that would eat into a lot of the funding.
    • It's not really though, is it. It's practical.  At least we're allowed Christmas lights.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...