Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"The spelling teh...........why?"


I'm a big culprit here - it's a common enough typo apparently. If it's any consolation it drives me nuts too and I catch a LOT of them before I click post. Which is even more shocking


ted - nanny state or no, have you seen people suffering on a hot and crowded train on a hot day, and how many of them need but don't have water? being reminded is no bad thing.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "when asked "how are you" the response "I'm good".

> I'm enquiring after your health not your

> behavioural status"

>

> http://motivatedgrammar.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/t

> he-im-good-outrage-is-nonsense/

> http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar

> /good-versus-well

>

> I'm well at pedantry ;-P


It still grates on me - in future if someone says "I'm good", I shall reply "at what?"

I was asked at a coffee shop what size cappuccino I wanted and I replied "Small". The barista (as opposed to barrister) looked bemused and asked "Do you want a regular one?", to which I replied "In Britain we say 'small' and not 'regular' - at least I do". The Americanisation of the country is going too far.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Funnily enough what grates with me is people

> deigning to tell others what to do whilst only

> exposing their own ignorance, even when given the

> correct information, making them irritatingly

> dogmatic zealouts.


If you mean me, El Pibe, I am entitled to interpret a person's response how I see fit - just because a language evolves doesn't mean I have to like it or, indeed, embrace it. Actually, you saw fit to tell me what to do. Anyhoo (now that one really irritates, although with yey high) - I'm off to enquire about someone's wellbeing - hope you all have a jolly well day.....

no, you're choosing to misinterpret what someone's saying by only allowing for one interpretation of the word good, and then projecting your ignorance onto another.


And don't use evolve, as if you've been caught out by a some new rule. You're simply having a reaction thanks to an incorrect prejudice that you must have learned from someone else; blame them I say!!


I'm not telling you what to do, im presenting you with the facts, choosing not to believe in gravity doesn't stop you falling out a window does it.


Anyhoo, teh my bad for getting wound up methinks.

Dialect prejudice is something I constantly have to force myself to overcome and not be wound up by (it's easy if you try ladynorwood).


Ironically "it's well" meaning "it's good" is a feature of language here, rather than incorrect, but a generous interpretation that maybe there's an implicit end to the sentence, say "your house is looking well [constructed]" could explain it.


Illuminous seems to be the standard word for luminous. Though comparisment seems to be only favoured among my in-laws rather than widespread so usually elicits a rolling of the eyes from me.


Irregardless gets no bye from me though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
    • Is it lame? Or is it Lamey? (sorry)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...