Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There's a difference between polite asking versus intimidating and annoying customers. The first is, I think, rather entrepreneurial and good luck to them. But if a simple "no" is not accepted then they should be given the boot off the premises by management.

Loz that's the problem. There are often around 15/20 guys stood around and they approach almost everyone who enters the car park and to someone by themselves this can often come across as quite intimidating particularly when you are approached by a couple of them. Sometimes they ask if you want a job doing then go away if you say no, often times I've totally ignored them and found they will pester until you literally say no half a dozen times. It's annoying more than anything, but I could see why some folk may find it intimidating.


Louisa.

The guys at B&Q are particularly nasty.


On one occasion whilst I was sitting in my car a Security Guard with a large Dog

approached them and told them to leave. About 20 of these guys confronted the Security Man

and seemed unperturbed by the dog.

It was only when " Police vans turned up that most of the guys disappeared into thin air.


Even then with a dozen or so Police also with dogs and the presence of an over head helicopter

they continued to argue.


I drove off at this time..


You really don't want to invite this mob into your homes..


DulwichFox

Fox that's a pretty regular occupancy unfortunately. I think the security guys gave up in the end due to the intimidation plus the fact it's private property and the police kind of have their hands tied in many ways. I wonder how often they have the police helicopter out for these guys? I've seen it out over there too and many of the guys just ran across to McDonald's or ASDA.


Louisa.

Back pocket for wallet...it's totally irrational. Front makes more sense from a theft point of view. I have an irrational rage against men at the barber who choose straight not natural hairline at the back. Don't know why!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...