Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Grauniad's readers' question last week was a along the line: My friend has invited us to his wedding but not our young kids, should I ask him to pay for child care.


There should have been a one liner: It's their wedding, they can do what they like.


But of course most responses were waffly with many of them being outraged.


Mine,not publishes, was to ask whether the friend could take over the running of one of my many local pubs cum creches.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/58452-no-children-at-wedding/
Share on other sites

Ha - just found this. Best answer was: Your husband is a prat. Being invited is an honour, they want to include you in their big day, and if they have to mind how much they spend, you should understand that. You go, and leave Grumpy to look after the children - you'll enjoy it much more without him, anyway.

Children have no place at a grown up event. I.e. a wedding! Unless it's mummy and daddy walking down the aisle.

The last thing I want to do as a wedding guest is trip over a child .... even if my 2 1/2 old was invited, I'd leave her home. That equates to a fun night for us :)

Agree - up to them to say if they 'want' kids or not. But is also up to you to accept or decline the invite on that basis.


One of my friends got married in St Andrews. I was breastfeeding at the time but the wedding said no kids allowed. It would have meant a trip for all of us all the way up there for myself, partner and two kids to St Andrews, but they weren't allowed at the wedding. I declined and explained why. I don't think she really understood She might now as she has her own child now.

Weddings without kids are rather dull anyway


I'd politely decline and send them gushing best wishes, then invite them out for dinner sometime after. I'd usually be more cynical, but weddings do weird things to people when planning them. Beware of Bride/Groomzilla syndrome


As Otta said re the rest

Been to some great weddings with kids present, some without. You get rather a different "vibe"... more hard drinking when the kids are safely away with the grandparents. But the daytime bit is probably more relaxed and chaotic (in a good way) when kids are around. Fine with me either way.. the only problem is that there will inevitably be some people who won't be able to come as a result.
When you marry a bit later in life though, and almost all your mates have kids, at something like 3 years of age they are considered a "full" head in terms of the costing from caterers. With not unlimited budget its either a few mates with their children as they have lots. This then means a lot of pals can't come as not affordable.

Kids at weddings if they are related sure - It's a difficult one to dodge with family. You can hardly tell siblings or cousins not to bring their kids because, well, they're your family too. If they get lary there's always plenty of Aunts and Uncles and Grandparents to rein them in or threaten them.


But unless you know friends' kids well and are Godparents or something, then of course not - if you're invited to dinner or a party you wouldn't take your kids would you? And - service and endless photos apart - that's all this is.

It's totally the decision of the bride and groom (it's their day), but they do need to accept that this decision will potentially effect who can come.


My friend was quite upset recently as hardly any of her friends were able to go her wedding whereas all her husbands could. It was hardly surprising as they live where he grew up - all his friends are local and just needed a babysitter for the day, her friends are from far and wide including overseas and the child ban made it possible for most to attend.


Not everyone has weekend Childcare they can use.

Went to a wedding of a good friend a while back. The invite was carefully couched in 'we'd be delighted to have them but prefer it if we didn't' terms. As such, there were only half a dozen kids there.


Still, the little bleeders screamed all through the ceremony / speeches nonetheless.

If it was my wedding and a guest failed to accept my invite of only them and not their annoying brats, i'd be pretty f##%$? off if they brought them along regardless. I think I would even go as far as turning the family away from the event on the big day. It's my big day, don't like it? Get your own!


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If it was my wedding and a guest failed to accept

> my invite of only them and not their annoying

> brats, i'd be pretty f##%$? off if they brought

> them along regardless. I think I would even go as

> far as turning the family away from the event on

> the big day. It's my big day, don't like it? Get

> your own!

>

> Louisa.


I rest my case


Louisa - Bridezilla

At my wedding there were children and I must say they brought a good atmosphere to the wedding besides not everyone can leave their children at home and especially when its family or close friends that have kids you would want them at your wedding at least I wanted my family and their kids to share that moment with me also they had all gone after 8pm then the adults had their own time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Its a few years ago now, but I organised my end of year prom (for year 13) at Off the Cuff in Herne Hill - was on the cheaper side to rent and at that age, felt very cool and clubby. I had my own 18th at Whirled Cinema in Loughborough Junction but I'm not sure if they take event bookings like that anymore 
    • You are right . It isn't going to change him for the better. Sending such a negative message is potentially counter-productive. Trump is narcissistic, arrogant, unpredictable, spiteful, divisive, and dishonest, with a penchant for a total a disregard for democratic norms.  He is one who bears a grudge so there's a case to be made for not offending him as he could react with a bunch of  adverse actions  such as  deciding to increase import tariffs on UK exports to the US.      
    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...