Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello lovely parents & carers,


We have decided that we will be going ahead with a summer play scheme.


However,we will not be Ofsted registered so can only have children over 8.


Here is some info:


-This will run for the first 4 weeks of the holiday

-Monday-Friday

-8-6

-?25

-Kids will bring a packed lunch

-The day will be structured so children can choose from different activities, sport related, arts & crafts based with also time allocated for free play.

-We will have a registration day that we will inform parents & carers of soon

-Trips will also be included in the price

-We have 50 places and 10 reserve places for children who wish to drop in on the day


We are really looking forward to the summer!


If you would like a place please email


[email protected]


Thanks so much


Kate

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Bawdy-nan, literally came on here to write a response to you. It will mean that we are closed for 4 weeks. However the funds that will be raised will help greatly towards activities for the rest of the year. For the past few years we have been alot more quiet over the summer holidays so this felt like the next step to take.


Thanks


Kate

Hi Kate,


Closing the adventure playground was not made clear in the original post or in the survey, if it had have been more response would have been different!


I think offering a playscheme & excluding all others is a terrible idea. This is a facility that I use with both of my children (9&6) quite regularly during the holidays as a drop in, I had no idea that this would no longer be available.


Why did you not make this clear earlier?

Thanks Kate.


That is a real shame, I think. I do understand that funds must be tight but it is a real shame to see yet another resource for young people "closing" when there is so little for them to do locally, especially independently, or semi-independently. I do agree that it might have been more honest to explain what the plans were before eliciting feedback via the survey. I know that DKHAP has worked very hard to serve the local community in the past so you must have thought hard about this but it's a blow for open access play.


Edited to add: in addition the fact that you won't be OFSTED registered means, and you must know this, that your service won't be able to be used by people on lower incomes who use tax credits to support childcare costs. So, its double "exclusive". I do note, of course, that your fees are a good deal lower than many other schemes offered locally (that are OFSTED registered).

I understand money is tight, but is it not possible to apply for funding in order to subsidise this further to allow low income families access? My nephews in North london attend one regularly, it's free, because it is run by the council. They are applying for funding in order to be run independently and costs will be subsidised. Is this a possibility?
  • 1 month later...

Hello guys,


Really sorry for the delayed response. Firstly I just wanted to apologise if I wasn't clear when asking for feedback in regards to a summer playscheme.


We have decided that this summer we will be open as usual (Monday to friday 11-5) and not do a playscheme.


we hope to see you guys this summer


Kate & the staff team

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...