Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello lovely parents & carers,


We have decided that we will be going ahead with a summer play scheme.


However,we will not be Ofsted registered so can only have children over 8.


Here is some info:


-This will run for the first 4 weeks of the holiday

-Monday-Friday

-8-6

-?25

-Kids will bring a packed lunch

-The day will be structured so children can choose from different activities, sport related, arts & crafts based with also time allocated for free play.

-We will have a registration day that we will inform parents & carers of soon

-Trips will also be included in the price

-We have 50 places and 10 reserve places for children who wish to drop in on the day


We are really looking forward to the summer!


If you would like a place please email


[email protected]


Thanks so much


Kate

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Bawdy-nan, literally came on here to write a response to you. It will mean that we are closed for 4 weeks. However the funds that will be raised will help greatly towards activities for the rest of the year. For the past few years we have been alot more quiet over the summer holidays so this felt like the next step to take.


Thanks


Kate

Hi Kate,


Closing the adventure playground was not made clear in the original post or in the survey, if it had have been more response would have been different!


I think offering a playscheme & excluding all others is a terrible idea. This is a facility that I use with both of my children (9&6) quite regularly during the holidays as a drop in, I had no idea that this would no longer be available.


Why did you not make this clear earlier?

Thanks Kate.


That is a real shame, I think. I do understand that funds must be tight but it is a real shame to see yet another resource for young people "closing" when there is so little for them to do locally, especially independently, or semi-independently. I do agree that it might have been more honest to explain what the plans were before eliciting feedback via the survey. I know that DKHAP has worked very hard to serve the local community in the past so you must have thought hard about this but it's a blow for open access play.


Edited to add: in addition the fact that you won't be OFSTED registered means, and you must know this, that your service won't be able to be used by people on lower incomes who use tax credits to support childcare costs. So, its double "exclusive". I do note, of course, that your fees are a good deal lower than many other schemes offered locally (that are OFSTED registered).

I understand money is tight, but is it not possible to apply for funding in order to subsidise this further to allow low income families access? My nephews in North london attend one regularly, it's free, because it is run by the council. They are applying for funding in order to be run independently and costs will be subsidised. Is this a possibility?
  • 1 month later...

Hello guys,


Really sorry for the delayed response. Firstly I just wanted to apologise if I wasn't clear when asking for feedback in regards to a summer playscheme.


We have decided that this summer we will be open as usual (Monday to friday 11-5) and not do a playscheme.


we hope to see you guys this summer


Kate & the staff team

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "North Korea style propaganda rants, I remind myself that he thinks Kemi Badenoch is the solution" Kemi is much better than mad raving Starmer and his other two stooges Reeves whose wrecking ball tactics are causing the UK economy to go of the side of a cliff and oh what happened to Rayner, where is she exactly, as she's gone so quiet or has Starmer put her back on a short leash again.    And as for North Korea, if Starmer had his way, that's exactly how we'd be treated, no freedom of speech or thought, oops, but that's what Starmer wants though isn't it  I hate to disagree with you, no chage that you, I happily disagree with you, the three stooges Starmer, Reeves and Rayner, couldn't have made more of a balls up in the first three months even if they had where all blindfolded. 
    • It’s just the way things are prioritised how much was spent on revamping that waiting room to show exclusive art shows while  there are still no usable lifts to the platforms
    • Fully appreciate your concerns rollflick, but (as you say) it's good news that contracts have finally been awarded. Feels like people want to bemoan its failure before work has even started, which seems a tad negative.
    • The first 9 months hasn't been a total calamity - not if you compare it to what came before. People have lost all sense of proportionality if they think Labour are THAT bad But If 2015 went differently we would have avoided Corbyn Brexit 5 prime ministers in 6 years   seems like a fair trade
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...